General

Profile

rklemme (Robert Klemme)

  • Login: rklemme
  • Email: [email protected]
  • Registered on: 10/21/2008
  • Last sign in: 09/05/2019

Issues

open closed Total
Assigned issues 0 0 0
Reported issues 4 10 14

Activity

06/09/2017

04:41 PM Ruby Feature #9001: Please package better standard library
windwiny (wind winy) wrote:
> some people agree ?
I support _adding_ Nokogiri to the standard library.
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

10/01/2016

09:04 AM Ruby Bug #12728: Negative lookahead does not work for "+" even though works for "@"
Yui NARUSE wrote:
> In case 2, the regexp just behave as if
> ...
Argh! Stupid me. Yes, the negative lookahead will also match with the closing bracket.
> Maybe use should `[a-zA-Z0-9]*` or something instead of `.*`.
I included...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

09/06/2016

01:54 PM Ruby Bug #12728 (Rejected): Negative lookahead does not work for "+" even though works for "@"
I'll attach a test program that shows the effect. Basically, if I have a negative lookahead in the regex like (?!@) and "@" shows up in the proper location I get a mismatch (1. case). This is expected. If I exchange the "@" with a "\+... rklemme (Robert Klemme)

01/30/2016

08:15 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
Coraline Ada Ehmke wrote:
> It should be noted that the leaders of the Postgres project rejected the language in the proposed CoC
I cannot see that from the email you referred to. On the contrary the first item of the list mentions ...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

01/28/2016

07:11 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
Lisa Beld wrote:
> I would recommend the Contributor Covenant. People complaining that it includes harassment in public spaces are most likely just guilty of doing so.
Please do not jump to conclusions! This is an assumption which...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

01/26/2016

12:21 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
Motohiro KOSAKI wrote:
> ph ph wrote:
> ...
Oh, it has started already.
If we start policing language on that level then we are forcing people into what they will consider a straitjacket. Some may leave, but what will be worse is t...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

01/25/2016

04:53 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
Vjatseslav Gedrovits wrote:
> What's the problem with current state of Ruby tech community?
I also asked a similar question but did not notice a reply to that yet. I am *suspecting* there might not be an issue that needs fixing. ...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

01/24/2016

10:21 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
ph ph wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
> ...
I don't know what makes you believe I am thinking about doing that - certainly not my comments here. Apparently you are misreading me or have not been reading my earlier comments. You are add...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)
06:44 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
Coraline Ada Ehmke wrote:
> Suggested draft for community guidelines. I've tried to incorporate language that other people have suggested without losing any context or important criteria.
Thank you for the update!
> ...
That means...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)
12:36 PM Ruby Misc #12004: Code of Conduct
David Celis wrote:
> Robert Klemme wrote:
> ...
But it also does not mean it *is* there. Can someone please point me to some examples of real issues our community has that are addressed by the suggested CoCs?
> I feel that many c...
rklemme (Robert Klemme)

Also available in: Atom