[#92891] Question: ruby 2.7.0-preview1 also upgrades bundler to 2.1.0.pre.1? — Al Snow <jasnow@...>
Tried the new 2.7.0-preview1 upgrade to Ruby and see that bundler is also upgraded (to 2.1.0.pre.1).
5 messages
2019/05/30
[#92892] Re: Question: ruby 2.7.0-preview1 also upgrades bundler to 2.1.0.pre.1?
— SHIBATA Hiroshi <hsbt@...>
2019/05/30
Bundler 2.1.0.pree.1 is the expected version.
[ruby-core:92733] [Ruby trunk Feature#15865] `<expr> in <pattern>` expression
From:
mame@...
Date:
2019-05-21 01:58:12 UTC
List:
ruby-core #92733
Issue #15865 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
----------------------------------------
Feature #15865: `<expr> in <pattern>` expression
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/15865
* Author: mame (Yusuke Endoh)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee: matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)
* Target version:
----------------------------------------
How about adding a syntax for one-line pattern matching: `<expr> in <pattern>` ?
```
[1, 2, 3] in x, y, z #=> true (with assigning 1 to x, 2 to y, and 3 to z)
[1, 2, 3] in 1, 2, 3 #=> false
```
More realistic example:
```
json = {
name: "ko1",
age: 39,
address: { postal: 123, city: "Taito-ku" }
}
if json in { name:, age: (20..), address: { city: "Taito-ku" } }
p name #=> "ko1"
else
raise "wrong format"
end
```
It is simpler and more composable than "case...in" when only one "in" clause is needed. I think that in Ruby a pattern matching would be often used for "format-checking", to check a structure of data, and this use case would usually require only one clause. This is the main rationale for the syntax I propose.
Additional two small rationales:
* It may be used as a kind of "right assignment": `1 + 1 in x` behaves like `x = 1 + 1`. It returns true instead of 2, though.
* There are some arguments about the syntax "case...in". But if we have `<expr> in <pattern>`, "case...in" can be considered as a syntactic sugar that is useful for multiple-clause cases, and looks more natural to me.
There are two points I should note:
* `<expr> in <pattern>` is an expression like `<expr> and <expr>`, so we cannot write it as an argument: `foo(1 in 1)` causes SyntaxError. You need to write `foo((1 in 1))` as like `foo((1 and 1))`. I think it is impossible to implement.
* Incomplete pattern matching also rewrites variables: `[1, 2, 3] in x, 42, z` will write 1 to the variable "x". This behavior is the same as the current "case...in".
Nobu wrote a patch: https://github.com/nobu/ruby/pull/new/feature/expr-in-pattern
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>