[#87773] timer thread [was Re: [ruby-alerts:7905] failure alert on trunk-asserts@silicon-docker (NG (r63844))] — Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
> test_all <main>: warning: pthread_create failed for timer: Resource temporarily unavailable, scheduling broken
3 messages
2018/07/04
[#87836] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been reported by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
5 messages
2018/07/06
[#87838] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/06
[email protected] wrote:
[#87842] Re: [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes
— Koichi Sasada <ko1@...>
2018/07/07
On 2018/07/06 18:47, Eric Wong wrote:
[#87847] undefined symbol: mjit_init_p — Leam Hall <leamhall@...>
I pulled Ruby trunk on 3 Jul and am now getting errors similar to the
10 messages
2018/07/07
[#87849] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Takashi Kokubun <takashikkbn@...>
2018/07/07
As I told you, `make install` is needed to make Ruby work. Running
[#87852] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Benoit Daloze <eregontp@...>
2018/07/07
One more reason for https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/13620 maybe? ;)
[#87859] Re: undefined symbol: mjit_init_p
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/08
Benoit Daloze <[email protected]> wrote:
[#87986] [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt — mame@...
Issue #14915 has been updated by mame (Yusuke Endoh).
5 messages
2018/07/18
[#87987] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/18
[email protected] wrote:
[#88000] Re: [Ruby trunk Feature#14915] Deprecate String#crypt, move implementation to string/crypt
— "Urabe, Shyouhei" <shyouhei@...>
2018/07/19
normalperson (Eric Wong) wrote:
[#88088] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — normalperson@...
Issue #14937 has been reported by normalperson (Eric Wong).
9 messages
2018/07/24
[#88104] [Ruby trunk Bug#14898] test/lib/test/unit/parallel.rb: TestSocket#test_timestamp stuck sometimes — ko1@...
Issue #14898 has been updated by ko1 (Koichi Sasada).
3 messages
2018/07/25
[#88173] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — Greg.mpls@...
Issue #14950 has been reported by MSP-Greg (Greg L).
3 messages
2018/07/29
[#88189] [Ruby trunk Bug#14950] r64109 thread.c: move ppoll wrapper before thread_pthread.c - Windows compile failure - thread.c — nobu@...
Issue #14950 has been updated by nobu (Nobuyoshi Nakada).
3 messages
2018/07/30
[#88199] [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention — takashikkbn@...
Issue #14937 has been updated by k0kubun (Takashi Kokubun).
7 messages
2018/07/30
[#88213] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
[email protected] wrote:
[#88219] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/07/30
> yet, sky3 had a failure at
[#88306] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[#88308] Re: [Ruby trunk Misc#14937] [PATCH] thread_pthread: lazy-spawn timer-thread only on contention
— Eric Wong <normalperson@...>
2018/08/06
> > http://ci.rvm.jp/results/trunk@P895/1173951
[ruby-core:88082] [Ruby trunk Bug#14935] Inconsitent behaviour with puts and enumerator with different block format.
From:
lucasbuchala@...
Date:
2018-07-24 17:13:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #88082
Issue #14935 has been updated by lucasbuchala (Lucas Buchala).
I think this is because `do ... end` blocks has lower precedence than `{...}` blocks. As documented in [1]. So, probably, not a bug.
~~~
method1 method2 { ... } # method2's block
method1 method2 do ... end # method1's block
~~~
[1] http://ruby-doc.org/core-2.5.1/doc/syntax/calling_methods_rdoc.html#label-Block+Argument
----------------------------------------
Bug #14935: Inconsitent behaviour with puts and enumerator with different block format.
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/14935#change-73104
* Author: [email protected] (Puneet Sutar)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
* Assignee:
* Target version:
* ruby -v: ruby 2.3.1p112 (2016-04-26 revision 54768) [x86_64-darwin16]
* Backport: 2.3: UNKNOWN, 2.4: UNKNOWN, 2.5: UNKNOWN
----------------------------------------
### Case: 1
```
➜ ~ ruby
puts [1,2,3].map do |i|
puts i
end
#<Enumerator:0x007ffe930b76d0>
➜ ~
# block does get evaluated.
```
Case 2:
```
➜ ~ ruby
puts [1, 2, 3].map { |i| puts i }
1
2
3
➜ ~
# Block gets evaluated.
```
My question is Shouldn't both cases give consistent output.
--
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/
Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>