[#7055] More on VC++ 2005 — Austin Ziegler <halostatue@...>

Okay. I've got Ruby compiling. I'm attempting to get everything in

17 messages 2006/01/05
[#7058] Re: More on VC++ 2005 — nobuyoshi nakada <nobuyoshi.nakada@...> 2006/01/06

Hi,

[#7084] mathn: ugly warnings — hadmut@... (Hadmut Danisch)

Hi,

22 messages 2006/01/10
[#7097] Re: mathn: ugly warnings — Daniel Berger <Daniel.Berger@...> 2006/01/10

Hadmut Danisch wrote:

[#7098] Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/10

Daniel Berger wrote:

[#7118] Re: Design contracts and refactoring (was Re: mathn: ugly warnings) — mathew <meta@...> 2006/01/12

*Dean Wampler *<deanwampler gmail.com> writes:

[#7226] Fwd: Re: Question about massive API changes — "Sean E. Russell" <ser@...>

Hello,

23 messages 2006/01/28
[#7228] Re: Question about massive API changes — Caleb Tennis <caleb@...> 2006/01/28

>

Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited

From: "Berger, Daniel" <Daniel.Berger@...>
Date: 2006-01-06 18:36:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #7068
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [email protected] 
> [mailto:[email protected]] 
> Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 9:57 AM
> To: [email protected]
> Cc: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: 64-bit Solaris READ_DATA_PENDING Revisited
> 
> 
> 
> Hello,
> 
>  This patch is quite clever! I've been struggling with 64 bit 
> issue on amd64 and could not solve  the drb hang problem 
> cleanly. I'll test this patch monday and will generate patch 
> that works both sparc and amd64.  We have be very carefull if 
> SUN will ever change internal FILE structures in 64 bit mode. 
> Maybe we should as  nicely if SUN would implemented pending 
> read version for our needs.
> 
>   - Ville

You could probably get it into OpenSolaris.  Dunno about Solaris proper,
though.

- Dan


In This Thread

Prev Next