[#47787] Ruby Parallelism — Miguel Palhas <mpalhas@...>
Greetings
4 messages
2012/10/01
[#47790] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Open] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
32 messages
2012/10/01
[#48291] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
2012/10/25
[#48299] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/10/26
I don't have any objection.
[#48300] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/10/26
On Fri, Oct 26, 2012 at 02:40:53PM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47791] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— "kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI)" <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2012/10/01
[#47792] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/10/01
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 03:05:17AM +0900, kosaki (Motohiro KOSAKI) wrote:
[#47798] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/10/01
(2012/10/02 3:12), Aaron Patterson wrote:
[#47800] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/10/01
(2012/10/02 8:22), SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47802] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/10/02
On Tue, Oct 02, 2012 at 08:32:51AM +0900, SASADA Koichi wrote:
[#47807] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7097][Assigned] Thread locals don't work inside Enumerator
— KOSAKI Motohiro <kosaki.motohiro@...>
2012/10/02
>> For example:
[#47832] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7106][Open] FileUtils.touch should allow touching the symlink itself rather than the file the link points to — "cirrusthinking (Alessandro Diaferia)" <alessandro@...>
18 messages
2012/10/04
[#47841] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7109][Open] File.utime doesn't set nanoseconds — "bkabrda (Bohuslav Kabrda)" <bkabrda@...>
6 messages
2012/10/05
[#47842] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7109][Open] File.utime doesn't set nanoseconds
— Tanaka Akira <akr@...>
2012/10/05
2012/10/5 bkabrda (Bohuslav Kabrda) <[email protected]>:
[#47847] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7110][Open] CGI: Add support for HTML5 <header> tag — "stomar (Marcus Stollsteimer)" <redmine@...>
16 messages
2012/10/05
[#47880] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7134][Open] Signal handling bug in Mac OS X — "auastro (Andy Kitchen)" <kitchen.andy+rubybug@...>
17 messages
2012/10/10
[#48918] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7134][Assigned] Signal handling bug in Mac OS X
— "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <mame@...>
2012/11/05
[#47881] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7135][Open] GC bug in Ruby 1.9.3-p194? — "alexdowad (Alex Dowad)" <alexinbeijing@...>
21 messages
2012/10/10
[#47887] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7137][Open] Date.parse overly lenient when attempting to parse Monday? — "garysweaver (Gary Weaver)" <garysweaver@...>
12 messages
2012/10/10
[#47927] new ruby 1.9.3 maintainer — "U.Nakamura" <usa@...>
Hello everyone of the Ruby development community
6 messages
2012/10/12
[#47930] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7148][Open] Improved Tempfile w/o DelegateClass — "Glass_saga (Masaki Matsushita)" <glass.saga@...>
14 messages
2012/10/12
[#47963] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7154][Open] For whatever reason \s doesn't match \u00a0. — "t0d0r (Todor Dragnev)" <todor.dragnev@...>
5 messages
2012/10/13
[#47970] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158][Open] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster — "gregprice (Greg Price)" <price@...>
30 messages
2012/10/14
[#48504] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster
— "h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki)" <h.shirosaki@...>
2012/10/27
[#48505] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/10/27
(2012/10/28 7:10), h.shirosaki (Hiroshi Shirosaki) wrote:
[#48728] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster
— "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <aaron@...>
2012/11/02
[#48732] Re: [ruby-trunk - Bug #7158] require is slow in its bookkeeping; can make Rails startup 2.2x faster
— Masaya TARUI <tarui@...>
2012/11/02
Thank you for the careful work.
[#48032] [Backport93 - Backport #7174][Open] Advocating for backporting 36811 — "jonforums (Jon Forums)" <redmine@...>
8 messages
2012/10/16
[#48086] [Backport93 - Backport #7174][Assigned] Advocating for backporting 36811
— "usa (Usaku NAKAMURA)" <usa@...>
2012/10/19
[#48040] Should Hash#dup automatically rehash — Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
Hi,
5 messages
2012/10/17
[#48072] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7184][Open] --disable-gems commandline parameter does not show up with ruby -h — "steenslag (siep korteling)" <s.korteling@...>
10 messages
2012/10/18
[#48132] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7201][Open] Setting default_external affects STDIN encoding but default_internal does not — "brixen (Brian Ford)" <brixen@...>
6 messages
2012/10/21
[#48154] Patch to test_ssl to validate server-side support for SNI — Patrick Toomey <ptoomey3@...>
I recently made a pull request to JRuby (
4 messages
2012/10/22
[#48675] Re: Patch to test_ssl to validate server-side support for SNI
— Charles Oliver Nutter <headius@...>
2012/10/31
We have incorporated Patrick's SNI patch for upcoming release JRuby
[#48191] [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze — Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
Japanese later; 日本語は後で
37 messages
2012/10/24
[#48197] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/10/24
Em 24-10-2012 09:39, Yusuke Endoh escreveu:
[#48696] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/11/01
(2012/10/24 5:39), Yusuke Endoh wrote:
[#48701] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/11/01
Hello ko1,
[#48712] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— Marc-Andre Lafortune <ruby-core-mailing-list@...>
2012/11/01
Hi,
[#48713] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— Yusuke Endoh <mame@...>
2012/11/01
AFAIK matz has not accepted #6636 completely yet.
[#48797] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— Clay Trump <clay.trump@...>
2012/11/03
Sorry, late to the party, but what's the status of #6679?
[#48798] Re: [ANN] 2.0.0 feature freeze
— =?KOI8-R?B?4NLJyiDzz8vPzM/X?= <funny.falcon@...>
2012/11/03
What status of #6638 <https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/6638>
[#48260] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7214][Open] Ruby 2.0 breaks support for some debugging tools — "banister (john mair)" <jrmair@...>
22 messages
2012/10/25
[#49657] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7214] Ruby 2.0 breaks support for some debugging tools
— "denofevil (Dennis Ushakov)" <dennis.ushakov@...>
2012/11/20
[#48292] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7216][Open] object.c defines clone method for objects that cannot be cloned. — "therevmj (Michael Johnson)" <mj@...>
6 messages
2012/10/26
[#48315] [ruby-trunk - Bug #7220][Open] StringIO#initialize_copy causes aliasing between the objects — "brixen (Brian Ford)" <brixen@...>
13 messages
2012/10/26
[#48475] [ruby-trunk - Feature #3222] Can bignums have singleton class & methods? — "matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto)" <matz@...>
4 messages
2012/10/27
[#48497] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #3222] Can bignums have singleton class & methods?
— SASADA Koichi <ko1@...>
2012/10/27
(2012/10/27 23:25), matz (Yukihiro Matsumoto) wrote:
[#48551] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7241][Open] Enumerable#to_h proposal — "nathan.f77 (Nathan Broadbent)" <nathan.f77@...>
23 messages
2012/10/29
[#48587] [ruby-trunk - Feature #7241] Enumerable#to_h proposal
— "rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas)" <rr.rosas@...>
2012/10/30
[#48625] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7241] Enumerable#to_h proposal
— Aaron Patterson <tenderlove@...>
2012/10/30
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 07:58:33PM +0900, rosenfeld (Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas) wrote:
[#48631] Re: [ruby-trunk - Feature #7241] Enumerable#to_h proposal
— Rodrigo Rosenfeld Rosas <rr.rosas@...>
2012/10/30
Em 30-10-2012 16:23, Aaron Patterson escreveu:
[#48679] [ruby-trunk - Feature #905] Add String.new(fixnum) to preallocate large buffer — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <headius@...>
4 messages
2012/10/31
[ruby-core:48502] [ruby-trunk - Feature #3222] Can bignums have singleton class & methods?
From:
"Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <redmine@...>
Date:
2012-10-27 21:45:07 UTC
List:
ruby-core #48502
Issue #3222 has been updated by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).
ko1 (Koichi Sasada) wrote:
> (2012/10/27 22:20), Eregon (Benoit Daloze) wrote:
> > It makes sense to me to have them frozen, but I think we would need to freeze all Numeric instances as well for consistency (currently, Fixnum, Rational and Complex can have ivars).
>
> Float is frozen because of introduction of Flonum technique.
> I think Fixnum should be also frozen.
>
> I'm not sure about complex and rational. I don't think inconsistent
> because we can make your own Numeric classes (and we can't force it
> frozen). But I have no objection.
I think it's to custom Numeric subclasses authors to chose for them to be frozen or not,
but I think having all core Numeric subclasses instances frozen would make sense.
These are anyway already immutable for their functionality,
it seems weird to allow some kind of changes like singleton methods and ivars.
But you're right, as Rational and Complex are composed of other types,
it seems less important for them to follow Fixnum/Bignum/Float (and BigDecimal?).
However, freezing Fixnum would likely affect more code (notably because their instances are supposed to be unique in MRI).
So theoretically numeric primitives should always be totally immutable, but on the other hand I like having them as full-fledged objects (that is I dislike having an object/type distinction) and freezing them reduces freedom.
> class Fixnum; def fib; @fib ||= (self-1).fib + (self-2).fib; end; end; [0,1].each { |i| i.instance_eval { @fib = i } }
=> [0, 1]
> 42.fib
=> 267914296
This is fun but evil ...
----------------------------------------
Feature #3222: Can bignums have singleton class & methods?
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/3222#change-31833
Author: marcandre (Marc-Andre Lafortune)
Status: Assigned
Priority: Normal
Assignee: ko1 (Koichi Sasada)
Category: core
Target version: 2.0.0
=begin
Fixing up the rubyspecs led me to the following:
bn = 1 << 100
class << bn
def foo
42
end
end
# => TypeError: can't define singleton method "foo" for Bignum
bn.define_singleton_method(:foo){42}
# => TypeError: can't define singleton method "foo" for Bignum
On the other hand...
module Bar
def foo
42
end
end
class << bn
include Bar
end
bn.foo # => 42
If Ruby won't allow singleton methods for Bignum, then shouldn't it disallow access to the singleton class completely?
See also issue #601
=end
--
http://bugs.ruby-lang.org/