[#107430] [Ruby master Feature#18566] Merge `io-wait` gem into core IO — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18566 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

22 messages 2022/02/02

[#107434] [Ruby master Bug#18567] Depending on default gems when not needed considered harmful — "Eregon (Benoit Daloze)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18567 has been reported by Eregon (Benoit Daloze).

31 messages 2022/02/02

[#107443] [Ruby master Feature#18568] Explore lazy RubyGems boot to reduce need for --disable-gems — "headius (Charles Nutter)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18568 has been reported by headius (Charles Nutter).

13 messages 2022/02/02

[#107481] [Ruby master Feature#18571] Removed the bundled sources from release package after Ruby 3.2 — "hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18571 has been reported by hsbt (Hiroshi SHIBATA).

9 messages 2022/02/04

[#107490] [Ruby master Bug#18572] Performance regression when invoking refined methods — "palkan (Vladimir Dementyev)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18572 has been reported by palkan (Vladimir Dementyev).

12 messages 2022/02/05

[#107514] [Ruby master Feature#18576] Rename `ASCII-8BIT` encoding to `BINARY` — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18576 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

47 messages 2022/02/08

[#107536] [Ruby master Feature#18579] Concatenation of ASCII-8BIT strings shouldn't behave differently depending on string contents — "tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18579 has been reported by tenderlovemaking (Aaron Patterson).

11 messages 2022/02/09

[#107547] [Ruby master Bug#18580] Range#include? inconsistency for String ranges — "zverok (Victor Shepelev)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18580 has been reported by zverok (Victor Shepelev).

10 messages 2022/02/10

[#107603] [Ruby master Feature#18589] Finer-grained constant invalidation — "kddeisz (Kevin Newton)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18589 has been reported by kddeisz (Kevin Newton).

17 messages 2022/02/16

[#107624] [Ruby master Bug#18590] String#downcase and CAPITAL LETTER I WITH DOT ABOVE — "andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18590 has been reported by andrykonchin (Andrew Konchin).

13 messages 2022/02/17

[#107651] [Ruby master Misc#18591] DevMeeting-2022-03-17 — "mame (Yusuke Endoh)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18591 has been reported by mame (Yusuke Endoh).

11 messages 2022/02/18

[#107682] [Ruby master Feature#18595] Alias `String#-@` as `String#dedup` — "byroot (Jean Boussier)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18595 has been reported by byroot (Jean Boussier).

15 messages 2022/02/21

[#107699] [Ruby master Feature#18597] Strings need a named method like `dup` that doesn't duplicate if receiver is mutable — "danh337 (Dan H)" <noreply@...>

Issue #18597 has been reported by danh337 (Dan H).

18 messages 2022/02/21

[ruby-core:107697] [Ruby master Feature#18595] Alias `String#-@` as `String#dedup`

From: "danh337 (Dan H)" <noreply@...>
Date: 2022-02-21 20:21:45 UTC
List: ruby-core #107697
Issue #18595 has been updated by danh337 (Dan H).


byroot (Jean Boussier) wrote in #note-9:
> > Then why couldn't .freeze do that more valuable thing?
> 
> Because it's not free, it incurs an additional hash lookup, and may grow the interned string hash. So in many cases where you know that deduping isn't necessary, but you do want to freeze a string, it would slow things down.

Ok. So if `-"blah"` does do interning then that makes more sense. However I'm just not sure I could be in a situation where freezing a String is not also interning it. There is probably a good example but I can't think of it. Even if I'm in a loop, processing many mutable Strings, and I want to make them all unmutable, it seems worth the cost to do the intern. I confess I mistakenly thought `.freeze` on a String did that anyway.

> > The .@+ is still not resolved, even though #16295 is closed.
> 
> I closed it because I was the feature requester and after the two years of discussion I no longer believe `+@` needs a chainable alias. If you think it does, it might be best to open a distinct, very focused feature request. It's usually better that way anyway, as the smaller the feature request is, the easier it is to make a point.

Ok fair enough. Thanks.

----------------------------------------
Feature #18595: Alias `String#-@` as `String#dedup`
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/18595#change-96615

* Author: byroot (Jean Boussier)
* Status: Open
* Priority: Normal
----------------------------------------
This is a rescoped feature request for https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16295

### Rationale

[Unary operator have some precedence oddities](https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/issues/16150#note-39) (@headius)

This often force to use parentheses, which is awkward and breaks the chaining flow.

It's really not obvious what it does. I submitted many pull requests to various open source projects to reduce their memory footprint, and I am constantly asked what it does and I have to point to the `String#-@` documentation. [The last example was 3 days ago](https://github.com/dry-rb/dry-schema/pull/399#issuecomment-1043963073).

I believe that `String#dedup` would help users discover this feature, and in projects where 3.2 is the oldest supported version, it would allow for much clearer code.

### Proposal

It's all in the title: Alias `String#-@` as `String#dedup`.

Or maybe even rename `String#-@` as `String#dedup`, and make `String#-@` the alias?



-- 
https://bugs.ruby-lang.org/

Unsubscribe: <mailto:[email protected]?subject=unsubscribe>
<http://lists.ruby-lang.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/ruby-core>

In This Thread