Hello everyone,

Based on the recent instability of Lemmy.world, a lot of people have been wondering whether they should move to another instance.

I used to look at https://lemmy.fediverse.observer/list and recommend people to pick a generalist instance with as much users as possible (using the 1m column), usually

Of course, there are also the regional options

And of course, the thematic instances

I used to recommend the most populated instances, as we know that All depends on users subscribed from the instance.

However, now with the introduction of the Lemmy Community Seeder (https://github.com/Fmstrat/lcs), which

tells your instance to pull the top communities and the communities with the top posts from your favorite instances

do you think this should still apply? I have seen promising instances (high uptime, already on 18.4 that was released today)

Would you recommend users to join those as well, assuming that the admins use the LCS to populate the All feed? Most of us remember the Vlemmy.net disappearance, and it’s difficult to tell users to join small instances based on good faith, but at the same time, every instance needs to start somewhere, and they should be given a chance.

What do you think?

  • maporita ( maporita@unilem.org ) 
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    30
    ·
    3 years ago

    High on my list of important attributes is an instance that specifically does not defederate from others. If I see something I don’t want to see anymore I just block it myself. But I’d rather be treated like an adult capable of making my own decisions about what to see and read. If you’re also looking for this I suggest unilem.

  • Ada ( ada@lemmy.blahaj.zone ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    3 years ago

    If I were to move instance for some reason, my primary concern would be that they aggressively and pro-actively moderate bigotry of all sorts, rather than "both sides"ing it

  • I advertised my instance in a different thread. It’s been almost exclusively a single-user instance, and I use both LCS and Lemmony to federate popular content. I’ve been exceedingly happy with it and don’t plan on going anywhere, so I figured I could handle a few extra users.

    So if your criteria include:

    • High uptime
    • Federation with popular content
    • Sensible rules

    … feel free to check my instance out. Do note that so far, I’ve only defederated from exploding-heads (right-wing trolls) and threads (preemptively, of course).

    I’ll probably cap registrations at 100 users or so, just to make sure my systems can handle the load, then see where things stand.

  • ᴇᴍᴘᴇʀᴏʀ 帝 ( Emperor@feddit.uk ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 years ago

    I went with Feddit.uk as I am in the UK and it also helps give a more local spin to things because, increasingly, the English-language web seems to default to an American take on things and so going local helps counter that.

    Plus uptime is good and the admin has said they will wield the defederation hammer sparingly.

  • Ulu-Mulu-no-die ( ulu_mulu@lemm.ee ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    3 years ago

    with as much users as possible

    Wouldn’t this lead to the same problems lemmy.world is having?

    I would recommend choosing based on interests, rules that align with you, proximity to where you live, stuff like that. Population is not a problem, you can still participate everywhere because of federation.

    • Blaze (he/him) ( Blaze@sopuli.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      3 years ago

      The issues with choosing a small instance (let’s say less than 500 users) is that your All feed would be quite empty, as only communities that people on your instances subscribed to would show up, which is an issues with discoverability of new content.

      As I said in the post, the LCS tool can be a mitigation against that.

      Otherwise, I generally agree with you

      • Ulu-Mulu-no-die ( ulu_mulu@lemm.ee ) 
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        3 years ago

        I joined the fediverse a couple months ago, before the reddit protest started, admins of lemmy.ml were asking people to join smaller instances because they were being overloaded.

        So an instance with less than 500 users was the parameter I used to choose, that instance was lemmy.world lol, look at where they are now.

        I created a second account on lemm.ee only a few days ago for various reason, being populated wasn’t one of them :)

  • chrisbit ( chrisbit@leminal.space ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    3 years ago

    I’m the admin of mine. Why? Because I enjoy doing, it’s in the spirit of decentralisation, and I didn’t want to risk being part of an instance that defederates from leftist instances like Lemmygrad or Hexbear. I only intend to proactively defederate from fascist and troll instances, and NSFW to reduce legal drama.

    • guts ( guts@lemmy.ml ) 
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      3 years ago

      And this is the big advantage of Lemmy being decentralized, people don’t need to choose an instance with your political idiology.

            • trimmerfrost ( trimmerfrost@lemm.ee ) 
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              edit-2
              3 years ago

              When you are running a mainstream public service, you should be automatically obliged to uphold every dissenting speech. Otherwise, you will end up effectively censoring free speech

              I know instances don’t have to technically do that. But the same argument can be said for countries too. Islamic fascist countries like Iran say, “we will run our country whatever way we want”, which translates to murdering atheists, homosexuals, non-muslims and apostates, axing every obvious right, etc etc

              • chrisbit ( chrisbit@leminal.space ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                10
                ·
                3 years ago

                Hey, I get where you’re coming from, but I don’t see this as being a ‘free speech’ issue. This isn’t a public service that anyone is obliged to use - it’s social media that I’m spending my time and money administering, and I don’t want that effort to in any way spread right wing discourse, because I see it as harmful.

                Similarly, even if it was a public service that we’re talking about, say a national broadcaster, I don’t buy into the notion that they should carry ‘both sides of the story’ out of a sense of ‘balance’, or upholding ‘free speech’, if the other side are nutters.

                • Ulu-Mulu-no-die ( ulu_mulu@lemm.ee ) 
                  link
                  fedilink
                  English
                  arrow-up
                  5
                  ·
                  3 years ago

                  You have to right to do what you want, people criticizing your choices are those who are confused about what free speech really means (hint: it’s about the government, it doesn’t apply to private entities).

              • Ulu-Mulu-no-die ( ulu_mulu@lemm.ee ) 
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                8
                ·
                3 years ago

                Free speech means they don’t arrest you for what you say, it’s about the government, not private entities.

                Private platforms are free to do what they want, free speech rules don’t apply to them.

              • When you are running a mainstream public service

                What government is running a Lemmy instance and allowing regular people to make personal accounts?

                I know instances don’t have to technically do that. But the same argument can be said for countries too.

                Any individuals claiming sovereign immunity likely need mental help.

              • quat ( quat@lemmy.sdfeu.org ) 
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                3
                ·
                3 years ago

                Imho, the argument doesn’t translate to countries. In Iran, the government has a monopoly on governing, and most people can’t just hop over to another country with different laws. In effect, you can be stuck with a system you don’t like.

                In the digital world, and Lemmy in particular, the same is not true. If you have a computer, you can “start a new country” with your own rules. No one is forced to join, and you can’t force anyone else to do anything. As a whole, Lemmy allows all opinions. The problem is central power, and free federated software is a solution.

                • I get that. It’s an analogy, so it’s not going to be exactly the same particular situation. My point is when MANY BIG instances choose to censor one set of opinions, it’s going to stifle free speech. Until the censored people, make and grow their own instance up to the same level of popularity

    • Blaze (he/him) ( Blaze@sopuli.xyz ) OP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 years ago

      SDF is indeed a nice community.

      The issue with Beehaw is their defederation from Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, which prevents accessing some communities (even though I’m not a 100% if it’s bidirectional or only one way)

  • NightOwl ( NightOwl@lemmy.one ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    3 years ago

    I went with lemmy.one because of privacyguides from reddit, and I liked that the move of actually being serious about the protest by making an alternative to move away from. Very few of the subreddits I subscribed to ever decided to make an instance or a fediverse community, so lemmy.one was what I defaulted to in the beginning. Since then Android has made an instance too, so that’d be my second choice. Anyways, that’s how I decided by going with what I was familiar with.

  • alex [they, il] ( alex@jlai.lu ) 
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    3 years ago

    I have an account on Beehaw.org because I like their vibe and moderation policy, an account on sh.itjust.works for the occasional community creation (!olympics@sh.itjust.works promo time) and my main account on jlai.lu which is in my country and language.

    So my main choice is regional, and then it’s based on moderation policies & community creation permissions, etc., while on generalist instances. I’m thinking of swapping sh.itjust.works for a smaller, better moderated generalist instance that still allows community creation.

  • I’ve been on quite a few. But I mostly was on lemmy.world but their reliability is low. So I switched to Lemmy.ca who federated with basically everyone. Unlike World. I was on .ml for a while too but left for some reason. I’m also on Beehaw, I like it over there but it’ll never be my home instance mostly because you can’t create communities and they don’t federate with most of the ones I like. Being on Lemmy.ca allows me to interact with World and Beehaw from one account which is really nice. They also have really high up time!