"According to a deep dive by defense writer Mike Fredenberg, along with all the other diminished capacity, the standard missile (SM-3) variant was down 33% "
Their definition of being low on munitions is that they don’t have enough to win ww3.
Imagine telling the russian government that they cannot use their military bases in YOUR country to invade ukraine. There shouldn’t be any US military base in Spain to begin with but it seem the Spanish government has a different opinion.
If you argue that the burger reich doesn’t have the capability to invade a country you are ignoring what is happening just right now and you are downplaying the threat. US government isn’t running out of munitions, a prolonged Iran war could lower their stockpiles to a level that could make the country more vulnerable (war industry propaganda to boost military spendings)
How many artillery shell were used to kill Ali Khamenei? You sound like a propagandist arguing that north korea army is the strongest in the world because they outproduce everyone in bayonets.
What makes China and Russia more powerful
You sound brainwashed on either russian or chinese state propaganda
The US is just a clown country run by senile pedophiles.
So are most countries
North korea has nukes too, that doesn’t mean they have the capability to successfully attack any county in the world and kill the leader without any repercussions. It seem like you believe russia and china are better than US empire but that doesn’t automatically make them more powerful, combined the two countries doesn’t spend in war as half of what US does.
They are attacking few countries they have no control of yet
russia and china don’t have the capability to launch a full scale attack on a country on the other side of the world. US government is able to attack iran because they have control all over the region and in between
Attacking a different country every month isn’t really a sign of strength.
They are successfully attacking a different country every month and getting away with it with almost none repercussion. If this is not a sign of strength what else is?
Militarily the US is very powerful, but its actual influence is on the decline.
To me it looks like only the public perception of US government is on the decline, most world government are still aligned with US
The day US government will be unable to successfully attack a different country every month i would start to argue that they power is collapsing
the US absolutely doesn’t control the world
We are in a thread about US government killing the leader of a country on the other side of the world without any disturbance. No other country can do something like.
I would argue that their long term objectives are usually achieved, USA pretty much control the whole world.
It was indeed a stunt, keep in mind that the US spend trillions to maintain an army capable of invading other countries, it’s just not convenient for them to do so.
The scary part is how they succeed in their objectives.
US government spends more than a trillion dollar on war each year.
Any person working for the US military reading this thread: you are attacking another country as a cover up to your president being a pedophile
For any US soldier reading this thread: you are attacking another country to cover up for your pedophile president.
For any US soldier reading this thread: you are attacking another country to cover up for your pedophile president.
FBI is more interested in who leaked epstein’s death on 4chan than who he raped children with
no words. I’m commenting hoping this post get more visibility
The day they stop dropping bombs is the day they are actually running out of these