Re: Design by Contract
From: Yasuo Ohgaki Date: Tue, 10 Feb 2015 07:36:24 +0000 Subject: Re: Design by Contract References: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi Joe, On Tue, Feb 10, 2015 at 4:31 PM, Joe Watkins <[email protected]> wrote: > Actually I'm not sure it's at all sane to try to override contracts, I'd > actually avoid that completely, so no need to name contracts and no need > for magic __invariant. For example, class Animal { protected $legs; require($legs >= 0); } class Snake extends Animal { // Snake is fine, no leg } class Human extends Animal { // 2 legs. $this->leg === 2 } Overriding makes sense for many cases. Regards, -- Yasuo Ohgaki [email protected]
Thread (220 messages)
- AW: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
- RE: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
- Re: Design by Contract
- Re: Design by Contract
- Re: Design by Contract
- Re: Design by Contract
- RE: [PHP-DEV] Design by Contract
« previous | php.internals (#82346) | next » |
---|