Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
From: Matthew Leverton Date: Sun, 08 Feb 2015 21:17:25 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints References: 1 2 3 4 5 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 1:48 PM, Zeev Suraski <[email protected]> wrote: > > proposal everyone can rally behind, it very clearly failed. We didn't have > to wait for a vote by the way, it was clear from the discussion on > internals@. > Controversial RFCs are precisely the ones that SHOULD be voted on. Policy states that 2/3s means consensus on core language changes. The current 63.5% isn't too far from that. Just curious, but do you have a different number in mind for this vote? 90%? 80%? -- Matthew Leverton
Thread (187 messages)
- RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- Syntactical change to Scalar Type Hints RFC
- Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- Re: [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
- RE: [PHP-DEV] [VOTE] Scalar Type Hints
« previous | php.internals (#82176) | next » |
---|