On Mon, Feb 2, 2015 at 11:44 PM, Levi Morrison <[email protected]> wrote:
>> Since it's been two weeks and there are no remaining issues (aside from the lack of a
>> language specification patch - but that can be done later), I'm opening voting on this RFC.
>
> I just noticed that you kept T_SPACESHIP; while that is fun I don't
> think it is appropriate. It is a common name for the operator, but
> there are other common names as well. Even though I am undecided on
> the merit of the RFC I am voting "no" because of this detail.
Google "spaceship operator", now imagine adding "php", reconsider :)
It is not about funny but easiness to find it and what it is all about.
--
Pierre
@pierrejoye | http://www.libgd.org