Re: [RFC][Vote] Return Types
On Jan 19, 2015 1:21 AM, "Andrea Faulds" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Hey Pierre,
>
> > On 18 Jan 2015, at 16:55, Pierre Joye <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Addint/editing it means a re vote.
>
> I don’t think this is always true. For minor changes to the RFC text that
provide clarifications and do not change the actual proposal, there’s no
problem with editing during voting.
>
> In this case, the position of the return type in the anonymous function
syntax isn’t a new detail of the proposal, as it was already in the patch.
Adding it to the RFC would just help clear things up.
If the RFC is not clear, it should not proposed to vote on in the 1st place..
There must be no edit during the vote phase. It has abused too often
already. Be ready or wait until you are.
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Andrea Faulds
> http://ajf.me/
>
>
>
>
Thread (19 messages)