Re: Initial discussion - more deprecation options
On 07/05/2025 22:02, Tim Düsterhus wrote:
> Hi
>
> Am 2025-05-07 21:43, schrieb Niels Dossche:
>> Definitely NAK on deprecating properties, which has the potential of adding lots of
>> overhead.
>
> FWIW: Deprecating properties is already possibly by means of deprecating a property hook. I
> guess this is an acceptable workaround to not require a dedicated support + associated complexity.
>
Sure, since that goes via method logic, and hooks should be rare (by design), I don't have a
problem with the fact that's possible.
It's a reasonable workaround that you can already use today indeed.
Kind regards
Niels
Thread (7 messages)