Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Never parameters
From: Tim Düsterhus Date: Fri, 28 Mar 2025 11:18:45 +0000 Subject: Re: [RFC] [Discussion] Never parameters References: 1 2 3 4 5 Groups: php.internals Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
Hi Am 2025-03-21 21:41, schrieb Gina P. Banyard:I don't follow here. Neither interface “could be upgraded” to make use of generics, since the user would need to specify the type forAm I following that? Because just from writing that I am not sure I agree, which means I may be misunderstanding. :-)I am saying: interface I { pubic function foo(never $a); } can ***not*** be "upgraded" to interface I<A> {pubic function foo(A $a);} whereas it is possible to go from interface I { pubic function foo(mixed $a); } to interface I<A> {pubic function foo(A $a);} The implementing classes are completely irrelevant in this context.A
. However the former could just be upgraded toI<never>
and the implementing class could still override the parameter type with some specific type. This would not be better than the old interface with the hardcodednever
type, but also not worse. The latter would need to be upgraded toI<mixed>
, since otherwise you would be restricting passing types that you formerly didn't, which makes the entire exercise useless. Best regards Tim Düsterhus
Thread (33 messages)
« previous | php.internals (#126967) | next » |
---|