Re: [VOTE] Optional Interfaces
On 3/14/25 03:09, Juris Evertovskis wrote:
I voted "yes" on this.
I've heard from a number of folks over the years who have wanted this feature, and the use cases in examples 4 and 5 sold me on it.
I would strongly recommend coming up with a better name for this feature in the documentation, and I also think the documentation will need strong examples and also describe potential use-cases (like the RFC does).
Cheers,
Ben
Attachment: [application/pgp-signature] OpenPGP digital signature OpenPGP_signature.asc
Thread (12 messages)