On Sunday, 23 February 2025 at 17:57, Paul M. Jones <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> In earlier discussions on the Server-Side Request and Response objects RFC and the after-action
> sumamry, one of the common non-technical objections was that it would better be handled in userland.
>
> Seeing as there are at least two other WHATWG-URL projects in userland now ...
>
> - https://packagist.org/packages/rowbot/url
> - https://packagist.org/packages/esperecyan/url
>
> ... does the same objection continue to hold?
Considering that one of the other stated goals of this RFC is to provide this API to other core
extensions, the previous objections do not apply here.
Best regards,
Gina P. Banyard