Re: [RFC] Asymmetric Visibility, v2

From: Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 09:21:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Asymmetric Visibility, v2
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message


On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, at 23:51, Larry Garfield wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 20, 2024, at 7:22 AM, Rodrigo Vieira wrote:
> > Will the alternative syntax on hook not even be put to a vote?
> 
> It was, a year and a half ago when Aviz was first proposed.  The preference was split, but
> leaned toward the prefix-style syntax.  So we went with that.  I don't think we'll ever
> get everyone to want the same syntax, but we're using the one that was both somewhat more
> popular, and (as discussed in the RFC) arguably superior.
> 
> As the "comments in yield from" thread has shown, *any* even slight change to
> PHP's syntax will require work from static analysis tools.  That's the nature of the
> problem space, regardless of the syntax specifics.
> 
> --Larry Garfield
> 

Just to play devil’s advocate, it was also before we had property hooks who advertised itself as a
way to “wrap and guard access to object properties” but we are simply ignoring their existence
here.

— Rob


Thread (57 messages)

« previous php.internals (#124528) next »