Hi,
Minor point: Why is the $initializer return type null, instead of void? I
>> don't see a purpose to allowing an explicit null return and nothing else..
>>
>
> Updated to use "void". Both would work :)
>
>
Super minor nitpick: You have updated the prototype, but not the
explanation text which still says:
When initialization is required, the $initializer is called with the object
> as first parameter. The initializer should initialize the object, and must
> return null (or void). See the “Initialization Sequence” section.
>
However, given the :void return type, you can’t return null - that
would be a fatal error.
The phrase should probably be
When initialization is required, the $initializer is called with the object
> as first parameter. The initializer should initialize the object. See the
> “Initialization Sequence” section.
>
Philip