Re: [RFC] Static class

From: Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 23:49:41 +0000
Subject: Re: [RFC] Static class
References: 1 2 3 4  Groups: php.internals 
Request: Send a blank email to [email protected] to get a copy of this message
On Tue, 25 Jun 2024, Chuck Adams wrote:

> > On Jun 25, 2024, at 9:17 AM, Derick Rethans <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Having read this thread, and the previous one from half a year ago, 
> > I will do so too. In short, we shouldn't be encouraging static 
> > classes as a bag of static functions, that ought to be just 
> > namespaced functions.
> 
> Which brings us back to the age-old problem that functions can’t be 
> autoloaded. Me, I want first-class modules, but until we have those, I 
> have to settle for classes in the meantime. Scala/Kotlin-like 
> “companion objects” might be a good all-round substitute though.

There has been some work done on function autoloading too:
https://wiki.php.net/rfc/core-autoloading

cheers,
Derick



Thread (71 messages)

« previous php.internals (#123907) next »