Re: Overriding GMP objects
I am interested to see what people say to this. One of the primary reasons
I was given by no voters on my operator overload RFC was that it was not
useful enough to justify the complexity. Since then however we have had a
steady stream of people on list presenting their use cases that have run
into issues, and proposing hacks and workarounds.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2024 at 10:25 AM Rob Landers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> - should we revisit operator overloading instead of me hacking my way into
> it?
>
The primary reason I decided not to revisit the RFC with changes or updates
was that the conversations I had with voters led me to believe that this
was fundamentally unproductive to pursue. I would be happy to bring it
again if that changes, but I will not get involved in working on this
feature again unless I'm convinced the sentiment of voters has changed, or
at least has become changeable.
Jordan
Thread (11 messages)