On 26 June 2024 09:23:42 BST, Rob Landers <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>It will always output that warning, regardless of strict types, but as this thread has already
>covered numerous times, it is unobservable from the executing code unless you turn the warning into
>an exception.
I think this conversation is probably going round in circles, becoming a kind of "no true
Scotsman" debate of "well, yes, you can observe it that way, but..." and getting
further and further away from the topic of this thread.
I believe the pattern syntax in question has already been earmarked for "future scope", so
if/when it actually gets proposed, we can discuss the use cases, which is what actually matters.
Regards,
Rowan Tommins
[IMSoP]