| 12 days ago | mod | Banned whoever loves Digit ๐ต๐ธ๐บ๐ธ๐ดโโ ๏ธ@piefed.social from the community reason: MAGA / ableism |
| 29 days ago | mod | Banned โจ๏ธ๐๐๐๐บ๐๐๐โจ๏ธ@sh.itjust.works from the community reason: Troll |
| 1 month ago | mod | Appointed Jorunn (she/her)@lemmy.blahaj.zone as a mod to the community |
| 1 month ago | mod | Appointed Jorunn (she/her)@piefed.blahaj.zone as a mod to the community |
| 2 months ago | mod | Banned nesc@lemmy.cafe from the community reason: Bigot/troll |
| 3 months ago | mod | Banned HubertManne@piefed.social from the community reason: Used a transphobic slur |
| 3 months ago | mod | Locked Post After 2-year ban, trans Kansans will get to change gender on driverโs licenses |
| 3 months ago | mod | Removed Post DONT YOU EVER PUT ME IN A POSITION WHERE IM IN A SITUATION reason: Please keep this community to meta discussions of blahaj lemmy |
| 6 months ago | mod | Banned Toesโ@ani.social from the community reason: Loli |
| 8 months ago | mod | Unbanned F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works from the community |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned F/15/[email protected]@sh.itjust.works from the community reason: What aboutism/long mod history |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned DoucheBagMcSwag@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community reason: Racism/Bigotry |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned This is fine๐ฅ๐ถโ๐ฅ@lemmy.world from the community reason: Racism/Bigotry |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned AtariDump@lemmy.world from the community reason: Racism/Bigotry |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned endeavor@sopuli.xyz from the community reason: Ableism and mile long mod log |
| 8 months ago | mod | Appointed Ada@piefed.blahaj.zone as a mod to the community |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned Vanilla_PuddinFudge@infosec.pub from the community reason: Transphobe |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned MajesticElevator@lemmy.zip from the community reason: Transphobe |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned Amanduh@lemm.ee from the community reason: Transphobic troll |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned Not Chad McTruth@lemmy.world from the community reason: Too much. |
| 8 months ago | mod | Banned Kalvin@lemmy.world from the community reason: Troll |
| 9 months ago | mod | Removed Comment You can block it, but defederating doesnโt seems like a good idea for me.
I'm very aligned with lgbtq ideas (even if i would like better that the notion of gender itself stopped existing, so that people would stop discriminating themselves for dumb reason and be more diverse, but thatโs another subject)
But i think defederating from instances you donโt like (except the *Very Bad* instances) would just make the fediverse more and more torn apart.
One of the coolest things of the fediverse is that you can navigate across instances, ideologies, without the need of using multiple accounts, itโs fe-diverse! If it is to stop that, then lets just go back to forums, it would be easier.
Plus instance wars have always been a dumb thing. (personal opinion and instance which will get me roasted lol) by ๐TheGuyTM3๐@lemmy.mlreason: Gender diverse people aren't "discriminating themselves for dumb reasons" |
| 9 months ago | mod | Banned GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.works from the community reason: Repeated arguing and bad faith accusations against blahaj users in blahaj meta community |
| 9 months ago | mod | Removed Comment You're doing the exact things I accused you of. Care to respond to the rest of it? by GrumpyDuckling@sh.itjust.worksreason: Transphobic sealioning |
| 9 months ago | mod | Banned SplashJackson@lemmy.ca from the community reason: Transphobe |
| 9 months ago | mod | Banned fishos@lemmy.world from the community reason: Troll |
| 9 months ago | mod | Banned reactionality@lemmy.sdf.org from the community reason: Troll |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment If someone says they support me, I will assume they are genuine until proven otherwise. Not the other way around. I'm not going to demand proof that they have done something physical or monetarily to support queer folk, because even just voicing that they support us is support. by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: You don't get to argue with trans folk about what trans allyship looks like |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment I was banned for not agreeing that allyship needs to be earned, and considering I am a queer person myself I have every fucking right to make that argument. by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: You don't get to argue with trans folk about what trans allyship looks like |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment Blowjob is also a porn term; is "blowjob" a slur?
The genre of porn describes hermaphroditic characters; characters that have both sets of sexual organs. It, as a genre of porn, also originated in Japan. It's not a slur in the use of the porn genre, and unless you've seriously run into transphobes calling transgender people "futas" in a disparaging manner, the argument that it's a slur is just more stupid gatekeeping based on a stupidly hot take. by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: Don't argue with trans folk that objectifying sexualised terms are actually ok |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment I'd like to actually see what they said, because this community has a habit of flying off the handle taking things that weren't offensive at all as highly offensive.
See: This post wanting to ban a word that is otherwise not used in the way the OP describes. by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: Don't argue with trans folk that objectifying sexualised terms are actually ok |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment Futanari is literally just the Japanese word for "hermaphrodite" (or for a straight translation "dual form") and used broadly to describe androgyny. by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: Don't argue with trans folk that objectifying sexualised terms are actually ok |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment >You should not be using the term "hermaphrodite" to describe any trans person, in that context it is demeaning and invalidating.
I agree with that. But have you seen anyone doing that? Or were they literally talking about hermaphrodites?
>Also you should never describe intersex people as "hermaphrodites" we are by in large not hermaphrodites and using this term against us is hurtful and invalidating
Intersex and hermaphrodite are two different categories of the same thing, and both exist. All hermaphrodites are intersex; but not all intersex people are hermaphrodites. Again, have you actually seen someone using the term disparagingly against someone, or were they just talking about a genre of porn that features characters that clearly have both male and female genitalia? by ๐ฐ ๐ ๐ฑ ๐ฆ ๐ณ ๐ฆ ๐ฐ ๐ฎ @pawb.socialreason: Don't argue with trans folk that objectifying sexualised terms are actually ok |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment youโre completely misunderstanding.
to use the very offensive example - โi am an attack helicopter. you must refer to me as helicopterโ. How is that not an obvious troll? by breadsmasher@lemmy.worldreason: Gatekeeping |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment are you ok with someone making a mockery of trans rights? by breadsmasher@lemmy.worldreason: Neopronouns aren't mockery |
| 11 months ago | mod | Removed Comment My issue is with consent. It has nothing to do with being trans. This individuals "pronoun" is in reference to their kink of "dragonfucking," it has nothing to do with gender identity. I do not consent to participate in this voyeur's sexual arousal, and attempting to force others to do so makes the individual a sex pest. Protecting this behavior is protecting a predator. by Letstakealook@lemm.eereason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Locked Post I'm trans and new to Lemmy. Can I have some lore on what's going on with Hexbear? |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment No I'm just interested in the previous message. I can see it's a private conversation and depending on why the previous message is, the meaning of Nutomic's can change drastically. Posting a private message that clearly includes a suggestion from the message it's replying to, in order to glean at a person's position on something like that is sus to say the least. by Avid Amoeba@lemmy.careason: Defending transphobia |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Post should we consider defederating? (.org) reason: "kys" is not acceptable |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment Log on around 11am CET
The Europeans are up and about, and the angry, leaded-petrol-huffing gun-owning cowards are mostly sleeping
Far, far more civilised by Mr_Blott@feddit.ukreason: Ironic flamebait |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment Hexbear.Net[,](https://sassacheck.org) originally Chapo.Chat, has sparked controversy due to rude behavior and controversial views from its users, leading to complaints on Blahaj.Zone and other Lemmy instances... Tensions grew, resulting in a defederation discussion that quickly became flooded with Hexbear users defending their actions.[.](https://medcertify.com.au/). by ejaz11@kbin.melroy.orgreason: Spam |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment And now, a lot of those trolls that use pronouns to troll lemmy are a protected class. Itโll only get worse from here. by Rhoeri@lemmy.worldreason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment I feel like a lot of people here have forgotten what Titles are and are just lumping in gender in there now.
Titles are what people used to use to describe what they are (muse, philosopher, dilettante for example) and _wasn't_ restricted to work.
So as one commenter here pointed out, goth, jock, etc would be titles, if used.
Gender was always meant to help identify where in the spectrum of sex one is. Whether that be male, female, both, neither, slightly female, etc.
Y'all are free to say your gender is goth, or as one user on Lemmy is becoming infamous for, Dragon; but you'll likely not be taken seriously, and ultimately you'll be setting back both progression for oppressed minorities as well as already existing accomplishments.
PS: op should say what neopronouns are for those who may not know. by Lumisal@lemmy.worldreason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment If your pronouns are such a unique snowflake of word, then they are indistinguishable from just using your name. The entire point of pronouns is that they are shorthands for groups of people with similar characteristics. Pronouns are supposed to be rough imperfect tools. They're pronouns, not names. That's their whole point. by WoodScientist@lemmy.worldreason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment The problem I have with neopronouns is that they're not pronouns. Pronouns are rough descriptors of large groups of people, to be shorthand. If you go by "he," "she," or "they," people can understand that and get the general gist of how you identify and want to be treated. They are useful tools of communication.
Neopronouns generally completely lack that utility. If I create my own unique pronoun, I'm forcing everyone to learn an entirely new set of words that apply only to me. Functionally, what is the difference between that and just learning your name and personality?
Pronouns are only useful because they are rough shorthands for broad groups of people. If a "pronoun" only applies to one out of 10 million people, it is no longer a pronoun, it is simply a name. by WoodScientist@lemmy.worldreason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment It's interesting from an outside ally pov to watch this community bend itself into a pretzel and practice some of the most inane mental gymnastics I've ever seen to accommodate individuals who demand unreasonable accomodations.
This is like listening to Christians explain how they know that they know that they know that they know, that their God is real and has dominion over all.
For myself I choose not to interact with those individuals as I find them utterly exhausting to interact with.
Neopronouns may indeed have their place, but so far I have found every single individual claiming one to be someone that I am thankful to never have any interaction with. by Scary le Poo@beehaw.orgreason: Gatekeeping |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Comment Thanks for clarifying that
I had to leave too many subreddits because they started making users respect literal pedophiles.
Shame you had to spitefully ban me instead of just saying that from the beginning. Kind of immature if you ask me.
Also, wanting pedos to be shunned is not in any way conflating anything. You are the one who is having issues condemning specifically pedophiles who will attempt to use your rule to validate themselves. by DeadWorldWalking@lemmy.worldreason: Equating neopronouns with pedophilia |
| 1 year ago | mod | Removed Post Ada's actions are contributing to a hostile environment |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post MindTraveller has an unhealthy obsession with this community, especially LinksOpenChest and LibertyHub |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Removed Post Why are trannies so disgusting reason: re-removing restored post for removal refederation |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |
| 2 years ago | mod | Restored Post Why are trannies so disgusting |