Modlog

CONTENT WARNING: Some deleted posts may contain disturbing or adult material. Proceed with caution.

/c/economics Modlog

Filter by user

Time	mod	Action
8 days ago	mod	Banned chemical_cutthroat@lemmy.world from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: lemmy.ml rule 1
8 days ago	mod	Banned n3m37h@sh.itjust.works from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: in 22 days
20 days ago	mod	Banned Archangel1313@lemmy.ca from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 17 days ago
20 days ago	mod	Unbanned Archangel1313@lemmy.ca from the community Economics@lemmy.ml
20 days ago	mod	Banned Archangel1313@lemmy.ca from the community Economics@lemmy.ml
1 month ago	mod	Banned 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: in 30 days
1 month ago	mod	Banned eRac@lemmings.world from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 11 hours ago
2 months ago	mod	Banned King@sh.itjust.works from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: lemmy.ml rule 1
2 months ago	mod	Banned n3m37h@sh.itjust.works from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1, 2 expires: 2 months ago
2 months ago	mod	Banned ooli3@sopuli.xyz from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: restore existing ban expires: 2 months ago
2 months ago	mod	Unbanned ooli3@sopuli.xyz from the community Economics@lemmy.ml
3 months ago	mod	Banned ooli3@sopuli.xyz from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 4 expires: 2 months ago
3 months ago	mod	Banned 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 4 expires: 2 months ago
8 months ago	mod	Removed Comment Are you a bot? Or a paid troll? There's no way anyone has the ability to post as much drivel online as do you without having a sponsor. First, you make an illogical statement, suggesting that social services somehow equates demographics (it doesn't) and then don't do anything to show how Russia and China have better social services. Even if they did (they don't), it wouldn't make a demographic argument. Your first linked study is odd. It suggests that almost 70% of women and almost 60% of men will have post-secondary degrees by 2070. Even if that was realistic (it isn't), what jobs do you think these Chinese people are going to have? They would have to abandon their current economy and adopt an entirely new economy. That means someone else would have to become the world's factory. The Chinese would be too busy in other jobs. Some things scale easily. If you want to build more engines, you can ramp-up production and quickly increase the supply of engines. If you want more professors of mathematics, that takes a generation. The people have to be born, educated, and then employed. It doesn't happen at once. The rate of growth is necessarily slow. Sure, you could get post-grad garbage degrees that require very little cognitive skill, but that's not what your article is suggesting. Second, [it is a fact that China's population is much, much lower than the Chinese government suggests.](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UM57HhM8yV8) See also [here](https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ftcLM3502_8). Your video on demographics is misleading because it looks at population growth rate. We already know China's future growth is well below what's needed because their birth rates are much, much lower. Population growth is a lagging indicator as China's "Great Leap" decimated China's population and therefore their population is missing many people who were born before 1962. These people born after the "great leap" are just now hitting retirement age. They will be dead in the next 20 years, give or take. This is why the author does not extrapolate data as it is projected into the future. Your youtube guy also suggests that immigrants are a problem to the US. They aren't. I am friends with a LOT of immigrants. Their children are just the same as mine. One of my friends told me she was sad because her daughter cries in English. To her that was an emotional disconnect. People used to say the same of Irish and Italian Catholics, that it'll break the US. They were wrong. Both integrated very well. Hispanics integrate well. Asians integrate well. Speaking of immigration, you still haven't replied to why nobody is immigrating to China and the US is very popular to immigrate to. It was a big part of your youtube guy's argument. But nobody on your side wants to tell us why immigrants want to go to the US but do not want to go to China. by 52fighters@lemmy.sdf.org reason: Rule 2
8 months ago	mod	Banned zr0@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 7 months ago
9 months ago	mod	Banned GeeDubHayduke@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 4 expires: 8 months ago
9 months ago	mod	Banned breadsmasher@lemmy.world from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1, 2
10 months ago	mod	Removed Post "China's economy is in a deflationary collapse." That's what they all said. reason: Dupe of https://lemmy.ml/post/27765889
11 months ago	mod	Banned PotatoLibre@feddit.it from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 10 months ago
11 months ago	mod	Removed Comment Cause it simplier to set rules in a open democratic world than in a dictatorship? No matter what you do, a commie system will inevitably dunk in a dictatorship. It happened all the time. by PotatoLibre@feddit.it reason: Rule 1
1 year ago	mod	Banned metaStatic@kbin.earth from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 1 year ago
1 year ago	mod	Banned kitnaht@lemmy.world from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 1 year ago
1 year ago	mod	Banned ogmios@sh.itjust.works from the community Economics@lemmy.ml reason: Rule 1 expires: 2 months ago
1 year ago	mod	Removed Post 23 Nobel Prize-winning economists slam Trump agenda, endorse Harris reason: US election spam
2 years ago	mod	Removed Comment Caused by leftists which is why we can eat them in the Mad Max times. by sproketboy@lemmy.world reason: Server rule violation #7