Modlog

/c/google Modlog
TimemodAction
2 months ago
mod
Removed Post had forgotten to change my @nordea card to my new one at #GleSYS and @[email protected] @lemdro.id @lemmy.world @gmail drive but have fixed that now
2 years ago
mod
Removed Comment Fuck YouTube by zcd@lemmy.ca
reason: Low effort
2 years ago
mod
Removed Comment And all these young people who can't pay rent are somehow able to buy new iphones as soon as they come out. Going into debt and making their lives worse just to have the latest phone model. Our priorities in this country are screwed up. And I've yet to understand why people want to be shackled to a phone screen all day long. The last thing I need is to check in with other people about every little thing all day long. by tygerprints@kbin.social
reason: User banned for rudeness
2 years ago
mod
Removed Comment That WAS me being civil. If I were to write what I truly wanted to write, it would singe your retinas off. by tygerprints@kbin.social
2 years ago
mod
Removed Comment Well you stink like bitch, and shit excuse. So at least I can be glad I'm not you, you filthy cunt. by tygerprints@kbin.social
reason: Rude, opting for warning + comment removal instead of immediate ban - "Well you stink like bitch, and shit excuse. So at least I can be glad I’m not you, you filthy cunt."
2 years ago
mod
Unbanned tygerprints@kbin.social from the community Google@lemdro.id
2 years ago
mod
Banned tygerprints@kbin.social from the community Google@lemdro.id
reason: Rule to users. "Well you stink like bitch, and shit excuse. So at least I can be glad I’m not you, you filthy cunt."
2 years ago
mod
Appointed Devgard@lemmy.world as a mod to the community Google@lemdro.id
2 years ago
mod
Banned AutoTL;DR@lemmings.world from the community Google@lemdro.id
2 years ago
mod
Removed Comment This is the best summary I could come up with: --- Google’s search engine is covered by federal privacy law, a court has ruled, opening the door for people to demand to have their names made unsearchable – commonly known as a “right to be forgotten.” The man said outdated and inaccurate information about him in newspaper articles found on the internet was leading to great personal harm, including physical assault, employment discrimination, severe social stigma and persistent fear. Ultimately, the Privacy Commissioner asked the Federal Court to rule on its jurisdiction to address the complaint under the Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act. The ruling authorizes the Privacy Commissioner to review the complaint to determine whether it should recommend to Google that the complainant’s name be delisted from the search engine. In carrying out that purpose, Google is agnostic as to the nature of that content: nothing turns on whether or not it is journalistic, let alone on whether it meets certain aspirational standards of journalism. Mr. Fenrick, the complainant’s co-counsel, said laws exist in Europe and in Quebec to allow people to press for their names to be delisted, and require privacy and autonomy to be balanced against the public’s right to know. --- The original article contains 873 words, the summary contains 195 words. Saved 78%. I'm a bot and I'm [open source](https://github.com/RikudouSage/LemmyAutoTldrBot)! by AutoTL;DR@lemmings.world