Modlog

/c/solarpunk Modlog
TimemodAction
6 小时前
mod
Removed Post I Remember a Few Years Ago Watching The Environmental Show on ‘Free Speech’ with this Famous Author John Mankins on Solar Energy Technology, from Near Space Orbit…
reason: off-topic
6 小时前
mod
Banned GreatWhite_Shark_EarthAndBeingsRightsPerson@piefed.social from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: repeated off-topic posting and arguing about it.
expires: 7 天内
10 小时前
mod
Removed Post I Remember a Few Years Ago Watching The Environmental Show on ‘Free Speech’ with this Famous Author on Solar Energy Technology, from Near Space Orbit…
reason: off-topic
10 天前
mod
Removed Post The 'Pro-Palestine' Counterinsurgency
reason: off-topic
14 天前
mod
Removed Comment Welcome to the solarpunk community! For the farming journey, portable power is essential - check out some LFP battery power stations on [GearScouts](https://gearscouts.com/power-stations) to keep your tools running off-grid with the best $/Wh value. by MysteriousSophon21@lemmy.world
reason: advertisement
14 天前
mod
Removed Post Imagining a better future: What I learned from solarpunk films - Ben Harris-Roxas
reason: duplicate
2 个月前
mod
Removed Post Anti-immigrant material among AI-generated content getting billions of views on TikTok
reason: not solarpunk, cross-post spam.
2 个月前
mod
Removed Post Open Source Power
reason: off-topic
4 个月前
mod
Removed Post How is this legal?
reason: off-topic
4 个月前
mod
Unlocked Post Southeast Asian Solarpunk Art Project digital art exhibition 2025 | ASEF culture360
4 个月前
mod
Locked Post Southeast Asian Solarpunk Art Project digital art exhibition 2025 | ASEF culture360
6 个月前
mod
Removed Comment What judgement? I was analyzing a statement, not a person, and asking for confirmation. Do you normally look for subtext? Also, fuck your passive aggressive sarcasm as a style. _This_ is a judgement: you appear to be pugnacious. by SreudianFlip@sh.itjust.works
reason: personal attack
6 个月前
mod
Removed Comment Happy to help you shake the dust off that one, gramps. Neat to see it in the wild, NGL. You wanna drill down on your blithe proliferation of distractionary philosophizing, or are we all just here for feel-good ear-finger-plugs, instead? Is that sage I smell? You got your crystals in alignment? "Seek out stories of"? Really? Fuck your low-effort-consumerism. DO something, potato. BE something. Stop watching/reading about those that ARE. Fuck you gently right back, cupcake. by otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: personal attack
6 个月前
mod
Banned otter@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: not constructive
expires: 6 个月前
8 个月前
mod
Removed Post Understanding Stellar Energy launch chat | Friday May 16, 2025
reason: spam
9 个月前
mod
Removed Post The Crown Estate Lays Big Floating Offshore Wind Plans
reason: OT
10 个月前
mod
Removed Post Georgia jury orders Monsanto parent to pay nearly $2.1 billion in Roundup weedkiller lawsuit
reason: track, no news here u.u
10 个月前
mod
Removed Post Historic Human Rights Ruling: Court Orders Ecuador to Protect Uncontacted Indigenous Peoples from Oil Industry Encroachment
reason: off topic, this sub is not for news
10 个月前
mod
Removed Post Greenpeace must pay at least $660m over Dakota pipeline protests, says jury
reason: off topic, this sub is not for news
10 个月前
mod
Removed Post The case for a U.S. sovereign wealth fund | Fortune
reason: us only
10 个月前
mod
Removed Post Urban Biosphere Experiment: The Apartment Of The Future?
reason: Already posted recently :)
1 年前
mod
Removed Comment You ah ever grow any plants? You ever work at a green house? You ever stick veggies up your ass or just keep your opinions up there? We are talking about feeding nations not your half dead lavender on the patio of your north facing apartment. by droporain@lemmynsfw.com
reason: rude, combative, troll account with history of comment removal
1 年前
mod
Removed Comment Opens article looks at picture. Yup bullshit. by droporain@lemmynsfw.com
reason: rude, combative, troll account,
1 年前
mod
Banned droporain@lemmynsfw.com from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: Rude, combative, highly downvoted, has history of trolling and having comments removed from communities
1 年前
mod
Banned Comment105@lemm.ee from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: troll
1 年前
mod
Removed Post Why USA progressives (solarpunks) should vote for Harris
reason: solarpunk community is to discuss solarpunk itself not USA elections; very offtopic
1 年前
mod
Banned anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: typical anon account to just spread hate
1 年前
mod
Removed Comment You are a complete piece of shit. Better hope you’re anonymous. by anon@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: free hate
1 年前
mod
Removed Comment Yeah but since every sane person supports the "genocide" you people made up you can just not vote, better for everyone anyway. by YourPrivatHater@ani.social
reason: genocide denial
1 年前
mod
Removed Comment The "genocide" is literally made up anyway by YourPrivatHater@ani.social
reason: genocide denial
1 年前
mod
Banned YourPrivatHater@ani.social from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: genocide denial
1 年前
mod
Banned FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: personal attacks and trolling
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment Simmer down Ted Kazynski, AI is good and actually helps the poor and hurts the rich that's why megacorps like the RIAA want to ban it. Open source non profit models run locally that trvialize violating IP and remove gatekeeping from the art industry is the closest thung to socialism we'll ever see. by LainTrain@lemmy.dbzer0.com
reason: comparing OP to a terrorist
2 年前
mod
Removed Post Humanity making progress like it always does
reason: doomerism is not solarpunk
2 年前
mod
Removed Post As temperatures in India break records, ancient terracotta air coolers are helping fight extreme heat | BBC News
reason: duplicate
2 年前
mod
Removed Post As temperatures in India break records, ancient terracotta air coolers are helping fight extreme heat | BBC News
reason: duplicate
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment You seem psychotic and broken. :) by emptiestplace@lemmy.ml
reason: personal attack
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment I hope somebody makes righteousness edible until you retire. Otherwise you're gonna have a bad time. by deafboy@lemmy.world
reason: personal attack
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment I wonder what it's like to be as dumb as that mit guy. Like just for a second no longer cuz I wouldn't wanna go full retard from overexposure. by Taohumor@lemmy.world
reason: ableist slur
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment Look into Nano. Actually trying to be an alternative currency, instant transfer (0.4s average), no fees, and uses 1KWh per 10,000 transactions. Lots of different ways to apply this technology, don't assume it's all bitcoin. by astreus@lemmy.ml
reason: crypto currency advertisement
2 年前
mod
Banned cumskin_genocide@lemm.ee from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: racist troll
2 年前
mod
Banned OpenTTD@lemmy.zip from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: mental breakdown and arguing a strawman.
expires: 2 年前
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment Oh fuck off by Splatterphace@lemm.ee
reason: unnecessarily hostile
2 年前
mod
Removed Post Long text #Solarpunk blogging community on the SLRPNK #Movim
reason: Not enough karma
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment You're delusional. Someone offers a verifiable fact and you go on about whiteness and hypercapitalism. This is how you alienate allies and end up dividing us even more. Which is exactly what our overlords want. Way to play into their hand like a useful idiot. by Ex Nummis@lemmy.world
reason: personal attacks
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment Said the seppo. 'e got no clue, just comments on comments. by beeng@discuss.tchncs.de
reason: uselessy offensive
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment god de instances are the fucking worst. by Omega_Haxors@lemmy.ml
reason: useless generalization
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment Shut the fuck up. You're useless. by blazeknave@lemmy.world
reason: personal attack
2 年前
mod
Restored Comment The article is fine, and I second the recommendation to read it, but from the article to the slogan you present, things do not follow a logical path. Yes, war is both an incredibly expensive activity (diverting money that could be used) and a resource-intensive activity (the money goes into actual materials that almost surely destroy something or get destroyed) and an incredibly stupid activity (and it can snowball)... ...but the problem is that successful unilateral disarmament during a war tends to result in a situation called "defeat". If the defeat is not an attack being defeated, but defense being defeated, that is called a "conquest". Now, letting a conquest succeed has a historical tendency of the conqueror having more experience at conquest, and more resources to conquer with... which has, several times in history, lead to *another conquest* or a *whole series of conquests*. A regional war in Ukraine resulting in Ukraine being taken over by Russia has a high probability of producing: 1) a bigger regional war later, in which Russia, using its own resources and those of Ukraine, proceeds to another country, gets into a direct conflict with NATO and then indeed there is a risk of a global war 2) an encouraging effect after which China, noting that international cooperation against the agressor was ultimately insufficient, and deeming itself better prepared than Russia, decides that it can take Taiwan with military force However, a war ending with inability to show victory tends to produce a revolution in the invading country. For example, World War I produced a revolution in Russia and subsequently a revolution in Germany, with several smaller revolutions in between, empires collapsing and a brief bloom of democracy in Europe, before the Great Depression and the rise of fascism ate all the fruits. The Falklands War produced a revolution in Argentina. The Russo-Japanese war produced the 1905 near-revolution in Russia. It is better for Ukraine to not get conquered. It is better for Russia to be unable to conquer Ukraine. That result is also better for everyone around them. It's even better globally because it sets a precedent of large-scale cooperation defeating an agressive superpower, discouraging agressive superpowers from undertaking similar wars until memory starts fading again. Unfortunately, until we see indications that Russian society is getting ready to stop the war (this could involve starting negotiations on terms palatable to Ukraine, a change of leadership, a withdrawal, a revolution, etc)... the path to achieving that outcome remains wearing out the agressor: producing enough weapons and delivering them to Ukraine. Ultimately, both sides in a war wear each other down. The soldiers most eager to fight are killed soonest. The people most unwilling to get mobilized or recruited, and soldiers most unwilling to fight - they remain alive. If they are pressed forever, some day they will make the calculation: there are less troops blocking the way home than in the trenches of the opposing side. After that realization, they eventually tend to mutiny. Invading troops tend to do that a bit easier than defending troops, because they sense less purpose in their activity. In the long run, if nothing else happens, that will happen. There is just (probably, regrettably) no particularly quick shortcut to getting there. by perestroika@slrpnk.net
2 年前
mod
Removed Comment The article is fine, and I second the recommendation to read it, but from the article to the slogan you present, things do not follow a logical path. Yes, war is both an incredibly expensive activity (diverting money that could be used) and a resource-intensive activity (the money goes into actual materials that almost surely destroy something or get destroyed) and an incredibly stupid activity (and it can snowball)... ...but the problem is that successful unilateral disarmament during a war tends to result in a situation called "defeat". If the defeat is not an attack being defeated, but defense being defeated, that is called a "conquest". Now, letting a conquest succeed has a historical tendency of the conqueror having more experience at conquest, and more resources to conquer with... which has, several times in history, lead to *another conquest* or a *whole series of conquests*. A regional war in Ukraine resulting in Ukraine being taken over by Russia has a high probability of producing: 1) a bigger regional war later, in which Russia, using its own resources and those of Ukraine, proceeds to another country, gets into a direct conflict with NATO and then indeed there is a risk of a global war 2) an encouraging effect after which China, noting that international cooperation against the agressor was ultimately insufficient, and deeming itself better prepared than Russia, decides that it can take Taiwan with military force However, a war ending with inability to show victory tends to produce a revolution in the invading country. For example, World War I produced a revolution in Russia and subsequently a revolution in Germany, with several smaller revolutions in between, empires collapsing and a brief bloom of democracy in Europe, before the Great Depression and the rise of fascism ate all the fruits. The Falklands War produced a revolution in Argentina. The Russo-Japanese war produced the 1905 near-revolution in Russia. It is better for Ukraine to not get conquered. It is better for Russia to be unable to conquer Ukraine. That result is also better for everyone around them. It's even better globally because it sets a precedent of large-scale cooperation defeating an agressive superpower, discouraging agressive superpowers from undertaking similar wars until memory starts fading again. Unfortunately, until we see indications that Russian society is getting ready to stop the war (this could involve starting negotiations on terms palatable to Ukraine, a change of leadership, a withdrawal, a revolution, etc)... the path to achieving that outcome remains wearing out the agressor: producing enough weapons and delivering them to Ukraine. Ultimately, both sides in a war wear each other down. The soldiers most eager to fight are killed soonest. The people most unwilling to get mobilized or recruited, and soldiers most unwilling to fight - they remain alive. If they are pressed forever, some day they will make the calculation: there are less troops blocking the way home than in the trenches of the opposing side. After that realization, they eventually tend to mutiny. Invading troops tend to do that a bit easier than defending troops, because they sense less purpose in their activity. In the long run, if nothing else happens, that will happen. There is just (probably, regrettably) no particularly quick shortcut to getting there. by perestroika@slrpnk.net
reason: Comment does not address intent of original post and promotes weapons industry / war in Ukraine.
2 年前
mod
Banned DarkThoughts@kbin.social from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: name calling
expires: 2 年前
2 年前
mod
Removed Post *Permanently Deleted*
reason: AI generated blogspam
2 年前
mod
Banned glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: troll and relativizing nazi crimes
2 年前
mod
Banned TokenBoomer@lemmy.world from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: low effort trolling
expires: 2 年前
3 年前
mod
Banned blazera@kbin.social from the community Solarpunk@slrpnk.net
reason: troll
expires: 2 年前