Jump to content
programming.dev
menu
Communities
Create Post
Create Community
heart
Support Lemmy
search
Search
Login
Sign Up
Modlog
alert-triangle
CONTENT WARNING
: Some deleted posts may contain disturbing or adult material. Proceed with caution.
/c/cryptography
Modlog
Filter by action
All
Removing Posts
Locking Posts
Featuring Posts
Removing Comments
Removing Communities
Banning From Communities
Adding Mod to Community
Transferring Communities
Adding Mod to Site
Banning From Site
Filter by user
All
search
All
Time
mod
Action
6 months ago
mod
Banned
Lime Buzz (fae/she)
@beehaw.org
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: False reporting
expires: 6 months ago
9 months ago
mod
Banned
Super_gamer46861
@lemmy.world
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: lemmy.ml rule 4, promoting dubious software
1 year ago
mod
Banned
Super_gamer46861
@lemmy.world
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: Rule 2
expires: 1 year ago
1 year ago
mod
Banned
Daxtron2
@startrek.website
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: lemmy.ml rules 1 and 2
expires: 1 year ago
1 year ago
mod
Banned
grue
@lemmy.world
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: False reporting
expires: 1 year ago
2 years ago
mod
Removed
Post
*Permanently Deleted*
reason: Not enough karma
2 years ago
mod
Banned
AutoTL;DR
@lemmings.world
from the community
Cryptography
@lemmy.ml
reason: these summaries are rarely any good
2 years ago
mod
Removed
Comment
This is the best summary I could come up with: --- Ultimately, users' multiple court challenges failed, sending the case before the ECHR while Telegram services seemingly tenuously remained available in Russia. Essentially, the government believed that FSB staff's "duty of discretion" would prevent any intrusion on private life for Telegram users as described in the ECHR complaint. Seemingly most critically, the government told the ECHR that any intrusion on private lives resulting from decrypting messages was "necessary" to combat terrorism in a democratic society. However, privacy advocates backed up Telegram's claims that the messaging services couldn't technically build a backdoor for governments without impacting all its users. The European Information Society Institute (EISI) and Privacy International told the ECHR that even if governments never used required disclosures to mass surveil citizens, it could have a chilling effect on users' speech or prompt service providers to issue radical software updates weakening encryption for all users. The "confidentiality of communications is an essential element of the right to respect for private life and correspondence," the ECHR's ruling said. --- The original article contains 602 words, the summary contains 166 words. Saved 72%. I'm a bot and I'm [open source](https://github.com/RikudouSage/LemmyAutoTldrBot)!
by
AutoTL;DR
@lemmings.world
reason: bad bot
Next