pgsql-hackers since 1999-03-28 00:00

The PostgreSQL developers team lives here. Discussion of current development issues, problems and bugs, and proposed new features. If your question cannot be answered by people in the other lists, and it is likely that only a developer will know the answer, you may re-post your question in this list. You must try elsewhere first!

Search the Archives

(enter a message-id to go directly to that message)

Browse Archives

Prev | Next

March 28, 1999

Thread Author Time
Another new regress test Tom Lane 02:27
Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Tom Lane 03:20
Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Tom Lane 04:16
Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Michael Contzen 15:46
Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Tom Lane 17:14
vacuum updated... Vadim Mikheev 21:35
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Bruce Momjian 21:59

March 29, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Jan Wieck 08:35
Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Tatsuo Ishii 09:04
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO Hal Snyder 09:28
signal weirdness Peter Galbavy 10:03
Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Broytmann 10:38
Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Broytmann 10:42
incorrect const usage Dmitry Samersoff 10:46
Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backend Chris Bitmead 10:58
Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness Peter Galbavy 11:17
New mirror Dmitry Samersoff 11:34
Re: [HACKERS] Locale patch (Greek locale and koi8-to-win1251 tests) Oleg Bartunov 11:41
libpq++ Dmitry Samersoff 12:33
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL LOGO The Hermit Hacker 12:54
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker 13:00
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Vince Vielhaber 13:17
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 13:26
Re: [HACKERS] signal weirdness Tom Lane 15:42
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane 15:45
Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Thomas Lockhart 15:47
Re: [HACKERS] Another new regress test Bruce Momjian 15:51
Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Bruce Momjian 15:59
Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Bruce Momjian 16:03
Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/access/heap heapam.c't Bruce Momjian 16:04
Re: [HACKERS] incorrect const usage Tom Lane 16:06
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 16:32
Re: [COMMITTERS] 'pgsql/src/backend/utils Gen_fmgrtab.sh.in' Bruce Momjian 16:58
Re: [HACKERS] Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backend Edmund Mergl 17:19
Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question D'Arcy J.M. Cain 17:27
Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Thomas Lockhart 17:28
Re: [HACKERS] Parser doesn't grok unqualified array element Thomas Lockhart 17:31
Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Vazsonyi Peter[ke] 17:32
Re: [HACKERS] Memory grows without bounds in aggregates! Tom Lane 17:40
Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Tom Lane 17:46
RE: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Michael Davis 17:53
Re: [HACKERS] Speedup idea: avoid using SQL procedures as aliases Bruce Momjian 17:54
Re: [HACKERS] NULL handling question Thomas Lockhart 18:09
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker 18:37
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker 18:40
Re: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 The Hermit Hacker 18:49
Re: AW: [HACKERS] Really slow query on 6.4.2 geek+ 20:07
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 21:15
Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Chris Bitmead 23:31

March 30, 1999

Thread Author Time
Commercial Support ... The Hermit Hacker 00:25
RE: [SQL] IIF.. Jackson, DeJuan 00:31
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Tatsuo Ishii 01:40
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker 01:49
SELECT (CASE ... ) gives copyObject error in current CVS build. Clark Evans 02:43
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Tatsuo Ishii 03:57
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker 04:07
RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan 04:07
Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Michael Davis 04:50
Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Cary O'Brien 04:52
Create user is failing under 6.5 Michael Davis 05:04
Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing Clark Evans 05:04
Re: [HACKERS] Some 6.5 regression tests are failing The Hermit Hacker 05:20
select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 Michael Davis 05:20
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Thomas Lockhart 06:09
Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Thomas Lockhart 06:14
Re: [HACKERS] select * from pg_veiw; errors in 6.5 and 6.4.2 Jan Wieck 08:01
Regression failures Chris Bitmead 08:30
RE: [HACKERS] Large objects error - expected a 'V' from the backe nd Peter Mount 08:53
Contacting me Peter Mount 08:55
RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 Peter Mount 10:00
dllist.c Patrick Welche 10:09
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Dmitry Samersoff 10:58
RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Herouth Maoz 11:59
Re: [HACKERS] Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Tatsuo Ishii 13:58
Re: Are large objects well supported? Are they considered very stableto use? Chris Bitmead 14:07
Announcing 6.5 Beta! David O'Farrell 14:16
Re: [HACKERS] Announcing 6.5 Beta! The Hermit Hacker 14:30
RE: [HACKERS] Create user is failing under 6.5 James Thompson 15:19
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... Bruce Momjian 15:57
Views, aggregations, and errors Michael Davis 16:11
Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Tom Lane 16:31
Re: [HACKERS] Regression failures Thomas Lockhart 16:37
Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker 17:18
Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill 17:25
RE: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Jackson, DeJuan 17:33
Re: [HACKERS] vacuum updated... The Hermit Hacker 17:38
RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Jackson, DeJuan 17:42
Re: [SQL] indexing a datetime by date Andrew Merrill 18:11
RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker 18:27
Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans 18:34
RE: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans 18:44
Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? Clark Evans 18:47
Re: [HACKERS] Should the following work...? The Hermit Hacker 19:08
Interesting failure when selecting aggregates Michael Davis 21:23

March 31, 1999

Thread Author Time
[OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Jackson, DeJuan 00:02
Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Roland Roberts 03:55
Bug Report - Compile errors in vacuum.c and shmem.c 📎 Billy G. Allie 08:06
Problem with complexer join still persists sometimes 📎 Michael Reifenberger 09:37
Date operations Oliver Smith 10:54
Date operations Oliver Smith 10:57
Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Oliver Smith 11:30
Re: [HACKERS] [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Thomas Lockhart 15:47
Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Thomas Lockhart 16:19
Re: [HACKERS] Date operations Thomas Lockhart 16:21
Bug Report - alter table does not work on temporary tables Clark Evans 16:22
Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Tom Lane 16:30
patches for 6.5 📎 Massimo Dal Zotto 16:39
problem with view Oleg Bartunov 20:11
RE: [HACKERS] [OT] Timezones and Daylight savings. Jackson, DeJuan 21:33

April 1, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane 00:07
Re: [PHP3] [OT]: SELECT COUNT(*) in Postgres Clark Evans 00:21
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Vince Vielhaber 00:30
Re: [HACKERS] libpq++ Tom Lane 00:58
Re: [HACKERS] Problem with complexer join still persists sometimes Tom Lane 01:06
Re: [HACKERS] Removing derived files from CVS Roland Roberts 03:16

April 17, 1999

Thread Author Time
UnixWare 7 patches for current CVS code. 📎 Billy G. Allie 20:39

April 19, 1999

Thread Author Time
adv: Important Psychic Message For You... silvia_brown 00:45

April 23, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [SQL] Finding the "most recent" rows Tom Lane 16:06
what are postgresql limits? valter 18:43
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy The Hermit Hacker 18:52
Re: [HACKERS] mailing list archives not updating The Hermit Hacker 18:54
RE: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Vince Vielhaber 19:06
PostgreSQL WWW Site ... The Hermit Hacker 19:13
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? The Hermit Hacker 19:25
Re: [HACKERS] MVCC Question The Hermit Hacker 19:30
List Archives ... The Hermit Hacker 19:31
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian 19:34
ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett 19:35
Re: [HACKERS] PostgreSQL Webpage -> PGSQL Advocacy Bruce Momjian 19:41
Re: [HACKERS] Re: [SQL] Finding the "most recent" rows Bruce Momjian 19:43
Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Bruce Momjian 19:53
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Bruce Momjian 19:54
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian 19:55
Re: [HACKERS] ERROR: mot_idx: cannot extend Bruce Momjian 19:58
I am feeling overwhelmed Bruce Momjian 19:58
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? valter 20:03
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy J.M. Cain 20:16
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster D'Arcy J.M. Cain 20:38
Just catching up Bruce Momjian 20:45
Keeping up Bruce Momjian 20:53
problems with time zones in JDBC Andrew Merrill 20:53
Re: [HACKERS] what are postgresql limits? Bruce Momjian 20:56
Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Peter T Mount 21:23
Re: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling Tom Lane 21:38

April 24, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Low Performance Hannu Krosing 13:51
Re: [HACKERS] Can't start postmaster Tom Lane 15:46
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane 17:46
[Fwd: [HACKERS] typeidTypeRelid Error] JP Rosevear 22:28

April 25, 1999

Thread Author Time
palloc at outer loop? Tom Lane 00:56
Vacuum Crash Richard Lynch 02:17
Efficiency of LIMIT ? Chris Bitmead 08:16
Re: [GENERAL] Vacuum Crash Vadim Mikheev 15:58
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Adam Haberlach 18:49
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich 19:32
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Bruce Momjian 19:41
Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Michael J Davis 21:08

April 26, 1999

Thread Author Time
Re: [HACKERS] Functions with aggregations (i.e. group by) causes an abort Tom Lane 00:46
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Tatsuo Ishii 02:53
Re: [HACKERS] Cygwin32 fix for current Tatsuo Ishii 04:47
Re: [HACKERS] A patch for FATAL 1:btree: BTP_CHAIN flag was expected Vadim Mikheev 06:57
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck 06:57
AW: [HACKERS] Re: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol hand ling Zeugswetter Andreas IZ5 07:00
CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Mariusz Czułada 07:01
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov 07:40
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Oleg Bartunov 07:45
decimal and numeric types José Soares 08:59
Re: [HACKERS] regression output The Hermit Hacker 13:39
psql bug ? José Soares 13:40
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett 14:18
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker 14:38
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... Jan Wieck 14:54
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Tom Lane 14:54
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Tom Lane 14:57
Re: [HACKERS] psql bug ? Bruce Momjian 15:18
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Jan Wieck 15:35
CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Goran Thyni 15:52
[Fwd: 6.5beta] Clayton Cottingham 16:16
Re: [HACKERS] It would be nice if this could be fixed... The Hermit Hacker 16:39
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral 18:06
Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral 18:14
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis 18:16
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis 18:18
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) 📎 Taral 18:20
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral 18:20
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral 18:25
Quoting backticks golliher 18:39
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Michael Lausch 18:40
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Todd Graham Lewis 18:45
Re: [HACKERS] create view as select distinct (fwd) Ryan Bradetich 18:57
Re: [INTERFACES] CASE tools? (slightly off-topic) Clark Evans 19:00
Re: [HACKERS] Re: ERROR: index_rescan: invalid amrescan regproc ??? Brian P Millett 20:57
RE: [HACKERS] views and group by (formerly: create view as selec t distinct) Michael J Davis 23:05

April 27, 1999

Thread Author Time
RE: Mysql comparison Vince Vielhaber 01:07
Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) G. Anthony Reina 01:18
Re: [HACKERS] Number of tuples (20300) not the same as heap (20301) Tim Perdue 01:24
unknown symbol 'lo_unlink' Tatsuo Ishii 01:32
Re: [HACKERS] Efficiency of LIMIT ? Leslie Mikesell 01:53
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) The Hermit Hacker 02:42
Re: [HACKERS] Re: CORBA again. (was: light dawns: serious bug in FE/BE protocol handling) Taral 02:50

Browse Archives

Prev | Next