Consequence (D): That what is is complete (Fr. 8, 32–49)

In Parmenides' Grand Deduction: A Logical Reconstruction of the Way of Truth. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 135-143 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This section addresses the claim that what is must be complete, or some would say perfect. This task involves making sense of Parmenides’ provocative claim that if that which is lacks one thing, then it lacks everything. In addition to this, the section shows how the claim to completeness depends, again, on the conclusion of the Governing Deduction.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
1 (#2,387,585)

6 months
1 (#2,187,047)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author Profiles

Michael Vernon Wedin
University of Chicago
Michael Wedin
University of California, Davis

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references