Digital twins or AI SIMs? What to call generative AI systems designed to emulate specific individuals, in healthcare settings and beyond

Journal of Medical Ethics (forthcoming)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Proposals to create AI chatbots or conversational ‘agents’ modelled on real human individuals, including specific bioethics scholars1 in the academic context, or individual patients (or potential future patients) in the medical context,2 have taken off in recent years. This has been accompanied by a lively and sometimes heated discussion about the ethics of creating or deploying such person-emulating chatbots in various contexts, both within and beyond the healthcare domain. Currently debated questions that are relevant to medical ethics and bioethics include: Not long ago, these questions would have seemed like science fiction. In the last few years, however, especially since the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in November of 2022, it has become increasingly easy to create digital simulations of individual human subjects, for example by fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) on person-specific corpora of speech, writing or other relevant data. Depending on …

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Fundamental Fallacy of “Empathic AI”.Karola Kreitmair - 2025 - Hastings Center Report 55 (3):36-44.
Artificial Intelligence and Medical Humanities.Kirsten Ostherr - 2022 - Journal of Medical Humanities 43 (2):211-232.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-09-28

Downloads
73 (#803,951)

6 months
53 (#163,587)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Brian D. Earp
National University of Singapore