Partial Understanding and Concept Possession: A Dilemma

Ratio 28 (2):153-162 (2014)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In the light of partial understanding, we examine the thesis that concepts are individuated in terms of possession conditions and show that adherents face a fatal dilemma: Either concept-individuating possession conditions include cases of partially understood concepts or not. If yes, possession conditions do not individuate concepts. If no, the thesis is too restricted and lacks a minimally satisfactory level of generalization

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Fully Understanding Concept Possession.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2018 - Crítica. Revista Hispanoamericana de Filosofía 50 (148):3-27.
Précis of A Study of Concepts.Christopher Peacocke - 1996 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 56 (2):407.
Truth, Content, and the Epistemic.Christopher Peacocke - 1999 - In Being known. New York: Oxford University Press. pp. 13-55.
Concepts in context.Andrea Onofri - 2012 - Dissertation, University of St. Andrews
Non-conceptualism, observational concepts, and the given.Federico Castellano - 2018 - Theoria: Revista de Teoría, Historia y Fundamentos de la Ciencia 33 (3):401-416.
Concepts and epistemic individuation.Wayne A. Davis - 2005 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 70 (2):290-325.
Concept possession.George Bealer - 1998 - Philosophical Issues 9:331-338.
Twin-earth externalism and concept possession.Derek Ball - 2007 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 85 (3):457-472.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-06-13

Downloads
243 (#169,099)

6 months
23 (#457,824)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Víctor M. Verdejo
Universitat Pompeu Fabra

Citations of this work

Moral Responsibility for Concepts.Rachel Fredericks - 2018 - European Journal of Philosophy 26 (4):1381-1397.
Understanding and disagreement in belief ascription.Víctor M. Verdejo - 2016 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 24 (2):183-200.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Concepts: Where Cognitive Science Went Wrong.Jerry A. Fodor - 1998 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Making it Explicit.Isaac Levi & Robert B. Brandom - 1994 - Journal of Philosophy 93 (3):145.
The Nature of Normativity.Ralph Wedgwood - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.

View all 41 references / Add more references