Does the Cosmological Argument Depend on the Ontological?

Faith and Philosophy 17 (4):441-458 (2000)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Does the cosmological argument (CA) depend on the ontological (OA)? That depends. If the OA is an argument “from mere concepts,” then no; if the OA is an argument from possibility, then yes. That is my main thesis. Along the way, I explore a number of subsidiary themes, among them, the nature of proof in metaphysics, and what Kant calls the “mystery of absolute necessity.”

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2011-12-02

Downloads
359 (#129,700)

6 months
21 (#511,811)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Citations of this work

Foundational Grounding and the Argument from Contingency.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion 8:245–268.
Foundational Grounding and the Argument from Contingency.Kenneth L. Pearce - 2017 - In Jonathan L. Kvanvig, Oxford Studies in Philosophy of Religion Volume 8. Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press. pp. 245-268.
Kant on 'the cosmological argument'.Graham Oppy - 2023 - In Ina Goy, Kant on Proofs for God's Existence. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. pp. 223-242.

View all 12 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

The Refutation of the Ontological Argument.P. J. McGrath - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (159):195-212.
From facts to God: An onto-cosmological argument. [REVIEW]William F. Vallicella - 2000 - International Journal for Philosophy of Religion 48 (3):157-181.

Add more references