Prairies and Paintings: The Aesthetic Appreciation of Nature and Art

Dissertation, University of Colorado at Boulder (2002)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I defend a theory of the aesthetic appreciation of nature inspired by John Dewey. I expand Dewey's claim that the appreciation of art is best understood in terms of consummatory experiences by claiming that the aesthetic appreciation of nature is also best understood in terms of consummatory experiences. ;Dewey argues that traditional theories of art selectively attend to objects in museums in order to understand art and ignore art's sources in and its effects on everyday life. Many of Dewey's claims have been absorbed by analytic aesthetics. For example, many philosophers agree that what we appreciate about art depends on understanding the work's context and that art serves important and various social functions. However, the analogous claim is anathema to theories of the aesthetic appreciation of nature. Nature is commonly understood as free from human interference, as beautiful if it is pristine and as aesthetically valuable independent of its human benefit. ;These claims are the result of selectively attending to nature as a thing apart from daily life. Nature has been placed into "museums" such as National Parks and National Forests. We can better understand the aesthetic appreciation of nature in term of its continuity with everyday life. First, rather than as a container for natural objects, the appreciation of nature is best understood as the appreciation of an environment, an object that includes the perceiver. Second, aesthetic experiences of nature are best understood as consummatory experiences. An experience of the Grand Tetons as majestic depends on appreciating the significance of their scalar relationship to human life. Third, aesthetic experiences of nature serve important and various social functions. Aesthetic experiences of harmony and mystery for example, change our understanding of our place in the world. We aesthetically appreciate both art and nature by having consummatory experiences. However, consummatory experiences of art are cultivated differently than are our consummatory experiences of nature. With art, we bring an experience to fulfillment by engaging with the object as the product of an artist's experience; we bring an experience of nature to fulfillment by engaging with the environment as the source of our own experience

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The aesthetic appreciation of nature.Malcolm Budd - 1996 - British Journal of Aesthetics 36 (3):207-222.
Everyday Aesthetics.Yuriko Saito - 2007 - Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press.
Pleasure of Art and Pleasure of Nature: A response to Matthen.Jane Kneller - 2017 - Australasian Philosophical Review 1 (1):85-89.
VII The Aesthetics of Nature.Malcom Budd - 2000 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 100 (2):137-158.

Analytics

Added to PP
2015-02-07

Downloads
1 (#2,387,721)

6 months
1 (#2,186,395)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references