The science in Hobbes's politics

In Graham Alan John Rogers & Alan Ryan, Perspectives on Thomas Hobbes. New York: Oxford University Press (1988)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The sense in which Hobbes produced a science of politics is often misunderstood. It was not a science because it was derived somehow from scientific psychology or mechanics. It was not a science in the sense that he broke down states into their component systems and their properties. Instead, it is a normative doctrine. It states precepts for citizens to escape the condition of total war, and it states precepts for sovereigns to legislate well (frame "good laws" in the sense of Leviathan, ch. 30.) The normativity of Hobbes's science is often missed. It contributes to what I call the "autonomy" of Hobbes politics within his system.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Leviathan after 350 years.Tom Sorell & Luc Foisneau (eds.) - 2004 - New York: Oxford University Press.
Interpreting Hobbes.Don Herzog - 1988 - Critical Review: A Journal of Politics and Society 2 (2-3):50-63.
I. Yet Another Hobbes.David P. Gauthier - 1969 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 12 (1-4):449-465.
Thomas Hobbes: critical assessments.Preston T. King (ed.) - 1993 - New York: Routledge.
Hobbes's persuasive civil science.Tom Sorell - 1990 - Philosophical Quarterly 40 (160):342-351.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
1 (#2,388,090)

6 months
1 (#2,183,658)

Historical graph of downloads

Sorry, there are not enough data points to plot this chart.
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Tom Sorell
University of Warwick

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references