The apparent illusion of conscious deciding

Philosophical Explorations 16 (1):18 - 30 (2013)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Recent work in cognitive science suggests that conscious thought plays a much less central role in the production of human behavior than most think. Partially on the basis of this work, Peter Carruthers has advanced the claim that humans never consciously decide to act. This claim is of independent interest for action theory, and its potential truth poses a problem for theories of free will and autonomy, which often take our capacity to consciously decide to be of central importance. In this article, I examine the nature of conscious deciding and I argue that Carruthers fails to establish the claim that humans never consciously decide to act

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Conscious Propositional Attitudes and Moral Responsibility.Uwe Peters - 2014 - Journal of Moral Philosophy 11 (5):585-597.
The Ontology of Conscious Thinking.Soteriou Matthew - 2013 - In Matthew Soteriou, The Mind's Construction: The Ontology of Mind and Mental Action. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press. pp. 227-256.
Deciding: how special is it?Alfred R. Mele - 2021 - Philosophical Explorations 24 (3):359-375.
Consciousness might matter very much.Adam Shriver & Colin Allen - 2005 - Philosophical Psychology 18 (1):103-111.
Unconscious Mens Rea: Criminal Responsibility for Lapses and Minimally Conscious States.Katrina Sifferd - 2016 - In Dennis Michael Patterson & Michael S. Pardo, Philosophical Foundations of Law and Neuroscience. Oxford, United Kingdom: Oxford University Press UK.
From causation to conscious control.Lieke Joske Franci Asma - 2023 - Philosophical Explorations 26 (3):1-17.
Mental Action and the Conscious Mind.Michael Brent & Lisa Miracchi (eds.) - 2023 - New York, NY: Routledge.

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-06-11

Downloads
1,890 (#17,324)

6 months
203 (#55,412)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?