Is the body a republic?

Journal of Medical Ethics 31 (8):470-475 (2005)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

The ethics of post-mortem organ retention and use is widely debated in bioethics and law. However, the fundamental ethical issues have often been inadequately treated. According to one argument, dead bodies are no longer “persons”. Given the great benefits dead bodies offer to human kind, they should be automatically treated as public property: when the person dies, the body becomes a public thing . This paper articulates the ethical issues involved in organ and tissue retention and use, both in the case in which the deceased’s wishes are known and in the case in which the wishes are not known. It contends that a dead body is not a republic. The state should maximise availability of organs and tissues by inviting or requiring citizens to make an informed and responsible choice on the matter

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-08-24

Downloads
125 (#366,788)

6 months
39 (#218,154)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

People and their bodies.Judith Jarvis Thomson - 2008 - In Theodore Sider, John Hawthorne & Dean W. Zimmerman, Contemporary debates in metaphysics. Malden, MA: Blackwell.
For the Protection of Others.Simona Giordano - 2000 - Health Care Analysis 8 (3):309-319.
Vol. I. - 2004 - Skepsis: A Journal for Philosophy and Interdisciplinary Research 15 (2-3).

Add more references