A willingness to be vulnerable: norm psychology and human–robot relationships

Ethics and Information Technology 23 (4):815-824 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Should we welcome social robots into interpersonal relationships? In this paper I show that an adequate answer to this question must take three factors into consideration: (1) the psychological vulnerability that characterizes ordinary interpersonal relationships, (2) the normative significance that humans attach to other people’s attitudes in such relationships, and (3) the tendency of humans to anthropomorphize and “mentalize” artificial agents, often beyond their actual capacities. I argue that we should welcome social robots into interpersonal relationships only if they are endowed with a social capacity that is functionally similar to our own capacity for social norms. Drawing on an interdisciplinary body of research on norm psychology, I explain why this capacity is importantly different from pre-programmed, top-down conformity to rules, in that it involves an open-ended responsiveness to social corrective feedback, such as that which humans provide to each other in expressions of praise and blame.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The seven troubles with norm-compliant robots.Tom N. Coggins & Steffen Steinert - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (2):1-15.
A fictional dualism model of social robots.Paula Sweeney - 2021 - Ethics and Information Technology 23 (3):465-472.
Why robots should not be treated like animals.Deborah G. Johnson & Mario Verdicchio - 2018 - Ethics and Information Technology 20 (4):291-301.
Should We Develop Empathy for Social Robots?Jue Wang - 2021 - In Ruiping Fan & Mark J. Cherry, Sex Robots: Social Impact and the Future of Human Relations. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 41-55.
Military robots should not look like a humans.Kamil Mamak & Kaja Kowalczewska - 2023 - Ethics and Information Technology 25 (3):1-10.
It Loves Me, It Loves Me Not.Sven Nyholm - 2019 - Techné: Research in Philosophy and Technology 23 (3):402-424.
Humans, Neanderthals, robots and rights.Kamil Mamak - 2022 - Ethics and Information Technology 24 (3):1-9.
Robots for the rest of us or the 'best' of us?Peter Danielson - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (1):75-81.
How hiring: Dogs and humans need not apply. [REVIEW]Richard G. Epstein - 1999 - Ethics and Information Technology 1 (3):227-236.

Analytics

Added to PP
2021-12-06

Downloads
81 (#699,620)

6 months
12 (#1,000,674)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Stephen Setman
Purdue University

References found in this work

What We Owe to Each Other.Thomas Scanlon (ed.) - 1998 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Brainstorms.Daniel C. Dennett - 1978 - MIT Press.
The second-person standpoint.Stephen Darwall - 2006 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Freedom and Resentment.Peter Strawson - 1963 - Proceedings of the British Academy 48:187-211.

View all 30 references / Add more references