Dear Carnap, Dear Van: The Quine--Carnap Correspondence and Related Work

Philosophical Quarterly 43 (170):121 (1993)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

ISBN(s)

0520068475

DOI

10.2307/2219956

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

On Quine on Carnap on Ontology.Marc Alspector-Kelly - 2001 - Philosophical Studies 102 (1):93-122.
Empirical equivalence in the Quine-Carnap debate.Eric J. Loomis - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (4):499–508.
Putting the bite back into 'Two Dogmas'.Paul Gregory - 2003 - Principia 7 (1-2):115-129.
Every dogma has its day.Richard Creath - 1991 - Erkenntnis 35 (1-3):347-389.
Carnap and Quine on Empiricism.Robert Almeder - 1997 - History of Philosophy Quarterly 14 (3):349-364.
Carnap and translational indeterminacy.William H. Berge - 1995 - Synthese 105 (1):115-121.
‘Two Dogmas’ -- All Bark and No Bite?: Carnap and Quine on Analyticity.Paul A. Gregory - 2003 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 67 (3):633–648.

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-18

Downloads
199 (#202,820)

6 months
35 (#247,392)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

How To Conceptually Engineer Conceptual Engineering?Manuel Gustavo Isaac - 2020 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy.
Carnapian frameworks.Gabriel L. Broughton - 2021 - Synthese 199 (1-2):4097-4126.
Carnap and Quine on Truth by Convention.Gary Ebbs - 2011 - Mind 120 (478):193-237.

View all 34 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references