The concept of time in late Neoplatonism: texts with translation, introd. and notes

Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, Section of Humanities. Edited by Shlomo Pines (1971)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Pseudo-Archytas.--Iamblichus.--Proclus.--Damascius.--Simplicius.--Plutarch.--Tatian.

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Call number

B517.S27

ISBN(s)

9004026398   9789004026391

Other Versions

No versions found

View all bargains

Buy this book

Find it on Amazon.com

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Time in Neoplatonism S. Sambursky and S. Pinés: The Concept of Time in Late Neoplatonism. Texts with Translation, Introduction, and Notes. Pp. 118. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities, 1971. Cloth. [REVIEW]A. H. Armstrong - 1974 - The Classical Review 24 (2):231-232.
Reading Neoplatonism: Non-Discursive Thinking in the Texts of Plotinus, Proclus and Damascius.John M. Rist - 2001 - Mind 110 (438):537-539.
Simplikios: Über die Zeit. Ein Kommentar zum Corollarium de tempore.Erwin Sonderegger - 1982 - Dissertation, Zürich
Soul and the structure of being in late neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus, and Simplicius: papers and discussions of a colloquium held at Liverpool, 15-16 April 1982.H. J. Blumenthal & Antony C. Lloyd (eds.) - 1982 - Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.
Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus and Simplicius.Anthony Meredith - 1984 - The Classical Review 34 (1):135-136.
The changing self: a study on the soul in later Neoplatonism: Iamblichus, Damascius and Priscianus.Carlos G. Steel - 1978 - Brussel,: Paleis der Academiën.
The First Principle in Late Neoplatonism: A Study of the One’s Causality in Proclus and Damascius by Jonathan Greig.Michael J. Griffin - 2021 - Review of Metaphysics 75 (2):375-377.
Soul and the Structure of Being in Late Neoplatonism: Syrianus, Proclus and Simplicius. [REVIEW]C. Steel - 1984 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 46:329.
Neoplatonism.Pauliina Remes - 2008 - University of California Press.
Iamblichus’ Response to Aristotle’s and Pseudo-Archytas’ Theories of Time.Sergey Trostyanskiy - 2016 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 21 (2):187-213.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
26 (#1,692,758)

6 months
13 (#930,814)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

Why Should Iamblichus Wish to Reify Time?Jeffrey M. Johns - 2025 - Elenchos: Rivista di Studi Sul Pensiero Antico 46 (1):137-149.
Platonismo e pitagorismo.D. P. Taormina - 2012 - In Riccardo Chiaradonna, Filosofia tardoantica: storia e problemi. Roma: Carocci. pp. 103--127.
Iamblichus’ Response to Aristotle’s and Pseudo-Archytas’ Theories of Time.Sergey Trostyanskiy - 2016 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 21 (2):187-213.
St. Basil the Great’s Philosophy of Time.Sergey Trostyanskiy - 2017 - Forum Philosophicum: International Journal for Philosophy 22 (2):219-246.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references