Alienation and the Metaphysics of Normativity: On the Quality of Our Relations with the World

Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy 26 (1) (2023)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

I argue that metaethicists should be concerned with two kinds of alienation that can result from theories of normativity: alienation between an agent and her reasons, and alienation between an agent and the concrete others with whom morality is principally concerned. A theory that cannot avoid alienation risks failing to make sense of central features of our experience of being agents, in whose lives normativity plays an important role. The twin threats of alienation establish two desiderata for theories of normativity; however, I argue that they are difficult to jointly satisfy.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Rahel Jaeggi’s theory of alienation.Justin Evans - 2022 - History of the Human Sciences 35 (2):126-143.
Spiritual Alienation.David McPherson - 2025 - Res Philosophica 102 (4):395-416.
An Individual Reality, Separate from Oneself: Alienation and Sociality in Moral Theory.Jack Samuel - 2024 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 67 (6):1531-1551.
Is Kantian Ethics Morally Alienating?Francesco Testini - 2023 - Public Reason 15 (1):76-82.
The Normativity of Morality.Evan Clark Tiffany - 2000 - Dissertation, University of California, San Diego
On the role of expectations in experiences of alienation.Matthew Burch - forthcoming - Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences:1-28.

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-08-27

Downloads
1,718 (#21,085)

6 months
316 (#22,084)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Jack Samuel
University of Pittsburgh (PhD)

References found in this work

Slaves of the passions.Mark Schroeder - 2007 - New York: Oxford University Press.
The second-person standpoint.Stephen Darwall - 2006 - Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

View all 99 references / Add more references