Aging, genomics, and society (2nd edition)

In Ruth Chadwick & Dhavendra Kumar, Genomics, Populations, and Society. Academic Press. pp. 241-250 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This chapter provides a philosophical overview of different approaches to age and aging. I challenge the belief that our age is always determined by the amount of time we have existed: chronology. I propose there are different views on age and aging. Biological age, which can be estimated based on epigenetics, might be more useful and important concept than chronological age. I suggest that sometimes some people should be allowed to change their legal age to reduce the harms that come from unjust assumptions related to old age. Changing legal age could also be used to fight ageism, discrimination based on age.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

On legal age change.William Simkulet - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):469-470.
Moral Case for Legal Age Change.Joona Räsänen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):461-464.
On Age.William Simkulet - 2024 - De Ethica 8 (2):33-43.
Further defence of legal age change: a reply to the critics.Joona Räsänen - 2019 - Journal of Medical Ethics 45 (7):471-472.
Biological age and the risk of discrimination.René Bünnagel - forthcoming - Journal of Medical Ethics.
Ageism.Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves - 2021 - In Henk ten Have & Maria do Céu Patrão Neves, Dictionary of Global Bioethics. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 103-103.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-11-19

Downloads
26 (#1,692,800)

6 months
5 (#1,636,448)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Joona Räsänen
University of Turku

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references