Complementarity of process and substance

Mind and Matter 4 (1):69-89 (2006)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Process philosophy endeavors to replace the classical ontology of substances by a process ontology centered on the notions of change and transition. We argue that the substantial and processual approach are mutually complementary in the sense of a generalized quantum theory which is not limited to physical phenomena. From this point of view, restricting oneself to either substance ontology or process ontology would be as ill-advised as exclusively relying on position or momentum representations in physics. A new view on Zeno's paradox lends itself. The meaning of a 'mental energy' observable, complementary to 'internal time', and its relationship to acategorial states of the human mind will be tentatively discussed.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Mind as process.Mark H. Bickhard - 2002 - In F.G. Riffert & Marcel Weber, Searching for New Contrasts. Vienna: Peter Lang. pp. 285-294.
Spinoza and process ontology.Francesca Di Poppa - 2010 - Southern Journal of Philosophy 48 (3):272-294.
Our cosmos, from substance to process.Timothy E. Eastman - 2008 - World Futures 64 (2):84 – 93.
Physical emergence and process ontology.William M. Kallfelz - 2009 - World Futures 65 (1):42 – 60.
Artworks, context and ontology.Božidar Kante - 2004 - Acta Analytica 19 (33):209-219.
Particulars.Johanna Seibt - 2010 - In Roberto Poli & Johanna Seibt, Theory and Applications of Ontology: Philosophical Perspectives. Springer Verlag. pp. 23--55.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
153 (#276,032)

6 months
13 (#925,985)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?