Filosofía del deseo 1: Aristóteles y el thymós

Tópicos: Revista de Filosofía 62:65-95 (2021)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Whit the aim of clariflying what exactly is the human phenomenon of akrasía or incontinence in the fullest sense, in Nicomachean Ethics VII.4-10 Aristotle introduces a type of incontinence by analogy, that is, incontinence due to thymós or courage. Despite his intentions, the explanation of the latter only complicates understanding the former, and the reader ends up without a clear understandingof either. The purpose of this article is to shed some light on the subject of akrasía due to thymós, trying, specifically, to answer three questions: what exactly is this passion? Who are worse, those who get carried away by their appetites or those who get carried away by their anger, and why? Finally, are we responsible for the mistakes we make in a fit of anger?

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2022-11-10

Downloads
31 (#1,576,525)

6 months
5 (#1,626,749)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The Loeb Classical Library.L. J. Richardson - 1911 - Classical Weekly 5:126-127.
Estudios aristotélicos.Alejandro G. Vigo - 2006 - Pamplona: Ediciones Universidad de Navarra.
Aristotle’s Rhetork on Emotions.William W. Fortenbaugh - 1970 - Archiv für Geschichte der Philosophie 52 (1):40-70.
Ethica Nicomachea. Aristoteles, Charles Hupperts & Bartel Poortman - 2006 - Tijdschrift Voor Filosofie 68 (4):843-844.
A Greek–english Lexicon. [REVIEW]D. M. Carter - 2007 - The Classical Review 57 (1):228-229.

View all 6 references / Add more references