Sources of, and exploiting, inconsistency: preliminary report

Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 7 (1-2):13-24 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

ABSTRACT Although much effort has been expended by researchers in trying to maintain a consistent belief base in formalizing commonsense reasoning, there is some evidence that the nature of commonsense reasoning itself brings inconsistencies with it. I will outline a number of sources of such inconsistencies, and discuss why they appear unavoidable. I will also suggest that, far from being a roadblock to effective commonsense, (detected) inconsistencies are often a reasoner's best guide to what to do next.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Analytics

Added to PP
2013-10-30

Downloads
152 (#278,542)

6 months
19 (#587,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Citations of this work

What's new isn't always best.Sven Ove Hansson - 1997 - Theoria 63 (1-2):1-13.
What's new isn't always best.Sven Ove Hansson - 2008 - Theoria 63 (1‐2):1-13.
Approximate coherence-based reasoning.Frédéric Koriche - 2002 - Journal of Applied Non-Classical Logics 12 (2):239-258.

Add more citations

References found in this work

The web of belief.Willard Van Orman Quine & J. S. Ullian - 1970 - New York,: Random House. Edited by J. S. Ullian.
A truth maintenance system.Jon Doyle - 1979 - Artificial Intelligence 12 (3):231-272.
Languages with self-reference I: Foundations.Donald Perlis - 1985 - Artificial Intelligence 25 (3):301-322.

View all 8 references / Add more references