Molinism: The Contemporary Debate

(ed.)
Oxford, GB: Oxford University Press (2011)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Molinism promises the strongest account of God's providence consistent with our freedom. But is it a coherent view, and does it provide a satisfying account of divine providence? The essays in this volume examine the status, defensibility, and application of this recently revived doctrine, and anticipate the future direction of the debate.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Chapters

Analytics

Added to PP
2012-04-15

Downloads
146 (#294,042)

6 months
40 (#211,883)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

References found in this work

Y.Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn - 2005 - In Bernd Moeller & Bruno Jahn, Deutsche Biographische Enzyklopädie der Theologie und der Kirchen (DBETh). Berlin, New York: De Gruyter Saur. pp. 1437-1438.
17.Mark Lance & Margaret Olivia Little - 2006 - In James Dreier, Defending Moral Particularism. Blackwell. pp. 305--321.
54. Polybios.C. Jacoby & G. F. Unger - 1886 - Philologus: Zeitschrift für Antike Literatur Und Ihre Rezeption 45 (2):321-368.

View all 8 references / Add more references