Vagueness and domain restriction

Abstract

This paper develops an idea of saving ordinary uses of vague predicates from the Sorites by means of domain restriction. A tolerance level for a predicate, along a dimension, is a difference with respect to which the predicate is semantically insensitive. A central gap for the predicate+dimension in a domain is a segment of an associated scale, larger than this difference, where no object in the domain has a measure, and such that the extension of the predicate has measures on one side of the gap and the anti-extension on the other. The domain restriction imposes a central gap.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

  • Only published works are available at libraries.

Similar books and articles

Leibniz and the Sorites.Samuel Levey - 2002 - The Leibniz Review 12:25-49.
Vagueness without context change.Rosanna Keefe - 2007 - Mind 116 (462):275-292.
Schiffer on vagueness.Matti Eklund - 2006 - Pacific Philosophical Quarterly 87 (1):12–23.
Just what is vagueness?Otávio Bueno & Mark Colyvan - 2012 - Ratio 25 (1):19-33.
Remarks on the Current Status of the Sorites Paradox.Richard DeWitt - 1992 - Journal of Philosophical Research 17 (1):93.
Chrysippus and the epistemic theory of vagueness.Susanne Bobzien - 2002 - Proceedings of the Aristotelian Society 102 (1):217-238.
Higher-Order Sorites Paradox.Elia Zardini - 2013 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 42 (1):25-48.

Analytics

Added to PP
2010-02-02

Downloads
170 (#241,832)

6 months
19 (#587,682)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Peter Pagin
Stockholm University

Citations of this work

Vagueness: Why Do We Believe in Tolerance?Paul Égré - 2015 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 44 (6):663-679.
Reference Fixing and the Paradoxes.Mario Gómez-Torrente - 2024 - In Mattia Petrolo & Giorgio Venturi, Paradoxes Between Truth and Proof. Cham: Springer Nature Switzerland. pp. 31-62.

View all 6 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

How to do things with words.John L. Austin - 1962 - Oxford [Eng.]: Clarendon Press. Edited by Marina Sbisá & J. O. Urmson.
Scorekeeping in a language game.David Lewis - 1979 - Journal of Philosophical Logic 8 (1):339--359.
On Quantifier Domain Restriction.Jason Stanley & Zoltán Gendler Szabó - 2000 - Mind and Language 15 (2-3):219--61.
Vagueness without paradox.Diana Raffman - 1994 - Philosophical Review 103 (1):41-74.

View all 13 references / Add more references