Response to Maydole

In Miroslaw Szatkowski, Ontological Proofs Today. Berlin, Boston: Ontos Verlag. pp. 487-500 (2012)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This paper is my second contribution to the Szatkowski volume. In the first paper, I provide a critical discussion of Bob Maydole's ontological arguments. In this second paper, I respond to Maydole's critical response to my first paper. My overall verdict is that Maydole does not successfully defend his arguments against my critical attack.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Analytics

Added to PP
2014-01-29

Downloads
644 (#89,356)

6 months
170 (#72,511)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Graham Oppy
Monash University

Citations of this work

Is God's Existence Possible?C'Zar Bernstein - 2018 - Heythrop Journal 59 (3):424-432.
Is God's Existence Possible?C'Zar Bernstein - 2015 - Heythrop Journal 56 (6).

Add more citations

References found in this work

Anselm.Sandra Visser & Thomas Williams - 2009 - New York: Oxford University Press. Edited by Thomas Williams.
The Ontological Argument.Jonathan Barnes & Thomas Mcpherson - 1973 - Religious Studies 9 (4):488-490.
The Ontological Argument.Robert E. Maydole - 2012 - In William Lane Craig & J. P. Moreland, The Blackwell Companion to Natural Theology. Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 553–592.
Maydole on Ontological Arguments.Graham Oppy - 2012 - In Miroslaw Szatkowski, Ontological Proofs Today. Berlin, Boston: Ontos Verlag. pp. 445-468.

Add more references