Why We Need not Accept the Psychological Approach

In The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology. New York, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 42-72 (1997)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

Most arguments for the Psychological Approach are based on the conviction that anyone who got your psychological features would be you. The possibility of fission proves this conviction false. Those who think that identity has no practical importance will find it even more difficult to argue for the Psychological Approach.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

The Human Animal. [REVIEW]Jim Stone - 2000 - Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60 (2):495-497.
Substance concepts and personal identity.Peter Nichols - 2010 - Philosophical Studies 150 (2):255-270.
The Human Animal.Tamar Szabo Gendler & Eric T. Olson - 1999 - Philosophical Review 108 (1):112.
Persons, animals, and human beings.Harold W. Noonan - 2010 - In Joseph Keim Campbell, Michael O'Rourke & Harry S. Silverstein, Time and Identity. Bradford.
Brain Transplant and Personal Identity.Kevin Jung - 2020 - Christian Bioethics 26 (1):95-112.
Are People Animals?Eric Todd Olson - 1997 - In The Human Animal: Personal Identity Without Psychology. New York, US: Oxford University Press. pp. 94-123.

Analytics

Added to PP
2026-01-22

Downloads
2 (#2,335,703)

6 months
2 (#1,998,301)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Eric T. Olson
University of Sheffield

References found in this work

No references found.

Add more references