Max Scheler und Ronald De Sousa über Werte und Gefühle

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to reconsider Max Scheler's philosophy of values in the light of the renewed discussion of axiological issues in contemporary emotion research. In this context, connections are drawn with Ronald de Sousa, who, like Scheler, seeks to demonstrate the relationship between emotions and values. While Scheler assumes an immediate feeling of value, De Sousa conceptualizes value perception as the apprehension of value properties in analogy to sensory perception. Based on De Sousa's concept of key scenarios and Scheler's assumption of a historically evolved ethos, this paper further analyzes the social and cultural aspects of value perception and the possibility of an objective hierarchy of values.

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

Similar books and articles

A personalist versus a rationalist theory of virtues.Susanne Moser - 2018 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 20 (1):169-184.
Tugend als Wert: Christoph Halbig und Max Scheler im Vergleich.Susanne Moser - 2016 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 18 (2):158-192.
On Emotional Truth.Venanzio Raspa - 2023 - Phenomenology and Mind 24:106-117.
Scheler on Feeling and Values.Jonathan J. Sanford - 2002 - Proceedings of the American Catholic Philosophical Association 76:165-181.

Analytics

Added to PP
2025-03-31

Downloads
40 (#1,376,233)

6 months
12 (#1,003,162)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Susanne Moser
Institut Für Axiologische Forschungen

Citations of this work

No citations found.

Add more citations

References found in this work

Vom Wert der Liebe.Susanne Moser - 2014 - Labyrinth: An International Journal for Philosophy, Value Theory and Sociocultural Hermeneutics 16 (2):20-47.

Add more references