Nothing compares 2 views: Change blindness results from failures to compare retained information

, &
Perception and Psychophysics 66 (8):1268-1281 (2004)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

This article has no associated abstract. (fix it)

Categories

Keywords

Reprint years

Other Versions

No versions found

Links

PhilArchive

External links

  • This entry has no external links. Add one.
Setup an account with your affiliations in order to access resources via your University's proxy server

Through your library

My notes

Similar books and articles

Induced failures of visual awareness.Daniel J. Simons & Ronald A. Rensink - 2003 - Journal of Vision 2 (3).
Metacognitive errors in change detection: Lab and life converge.Melissa R. Beck, Daniel T. Levin & Bonnie L. Angelone - 2007 - Consciousness and Cognition 16 (1):58-62.
False predictions about the detectability of visual changes: The role of beliefs about attention, memory, and the continuity of attended objects in causing change blindness blindness.Daniel T. Levin, Sarah B. Drivdahl, Nausheen Momen & Melissa R. Beck - 2002 - Consciousness and Cognition 11 (4):507-527.
Explicit mechanisms do not account for implicit localization and identification of change: An empirical reply to Mitroff et al (2000).Diego Fernandez-Duque & Ian Thornton - 2003 - Journal of Experimental Psychology 29 (5).
Metacognition and change detection: Do lab and life really converge?Daniel Smilek, John D. Eastwood, Michael G. Reynolds & Alan Kingstone - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):1056-1061.
A Comparison of Change Blindness and the Visual Perception of Museum Artefacts in Real-World and On-Screen Scenarios.Jonathan E. Attwood, Christopher Kennard, Jim Harris & Chrystalina A. Antoniades - 2018 - In Zoï Kapoula, Emmanuelle Volle, Julien Renoult & Moreno Andreatta, Exploring Transdisciplinarity in Art and Sciences. Cham: Springer Verlag. pp. 213-233.
Undetected changes in visible stimuli influence subsequent decisions.Axel Cleeremans - 2008 - Consciousness and Cognition 17 (3):646-656.
John Colet, On the Ecclesiastical Hierarchy of Dionysus, introduction, annotations, and edited text by Daniel T. Lochman, translation and comments on Colet’s Latin by Daniel J. Nodes Leiden and Boston, Brill, 2013, 379 pages. ISBN 978 90 04 25788 7. [REVIEW]Brendan Cook - 2014 - Moreana 51 (1-2):257-261.
Inattentional blindness: Perception or memory and what does it matter?Cathleen Moore - 2001 - PSYCHE: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Research On Consciousness 7.
Book Review: Solove, Daniel J. The digital person: Technology and privacy in the information age. New York: New York University Press, 2004, 283 pp. ISBN 0-8147-9846-2 ($29.95).Michael Zimmer - 2004 - Ethics and Information Technology 6 (4):301-302.

Analytics

Added to PP
2009-01-28

Downloads
62 (#969,783)

6 months
62 (#149,279)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Photo of Daniel Simons
Daniel Simons
University of Manchester

Citations of this work

Perceptual Pluralism.Jake Quilty-Dunn - 2019 - Noûs 54 (4):807-838.
Detecting olfactory rivalry.Richard J. Stevenson & Mehmet K. Mahmut - 2013 - Consciousness and Cognition 22 (2):504-516.

View all 15 citations / Add more citations

References found in this work

A sensorimotor account of vision and visual consciousness.J. Kevin O’Regan & Alva Noë - 2001 - Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24 (5):883-917.
Change Detection.Ronald A. Rensink - 2002 - Annual Review of Psychology 53 (1):245-277.
The dynamic representation of scenes.Ronald A. Rensink - 2000 - Visual Cognition 7 (1/2/3):17-42.

View all 16 references / Add more references