Communicative Gaslighting

Australasian Journal of Philosophy 103 (1):178-194 (2025)
  Copy   BIBTEX

Abstract

In this paper I identify a distinctive kind of gaslighting: communicative gaslighting. Communicative gaslighters intentionally misrepresent the communicative properties of an utterance—their own or their target’s—in a way which functions to undermine the target’s confidence in her abilities as a communicator. I argue that we can gaslight people as both speakers and hearers, and about (among other properties) the locutionary, perlocutionary, and illocutionary dimensions of utterances. Communicative gaslighting is concerning because not only does it undermine targets’ communicative agency, but also it can contribute to a general decay of communicative conventions.

Other Versions

No versions found

Similar books and articles

Emotional Gaslighting and Affective Empathy.Katharina Anna Sodoma - 2022 - International Journal of Philosophical Studies 30 (3):320-338.
Gaslighting-Up: When Gaslighting Is Good.Bobbi Cohn - 2025 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 11 (2).
Communicative skills in the constitution of illocutionary acts.David Simpson - 1992 - Australasian Journal of Philosophy 70 (1):82 – 92.
Some Reflections on Gaslighting and Language Games.Jeff Engelhardt - 2023 - Feminist Philosophy Quarterly 9 (3).
Anger Gaslighting and Affective Injustice.Shiloh Whitney - 2023 - Philosophical Topics 51 (1):27-62.
On Gaslighting.Cynthia A. Stark - 2025 - Philosophical Review 134 (4):525-529.
Dilemmatic gaslighting.Cameron Domenico Kirk-Giannini - 2023 - Philosophical Studies 180 (3):745-772.
Speech Acts and Pragmatics.Kent Bach - 2008 - In Michael Devitt & Richard Hanley, The Blackwell Guide to the Philosophy of Language. Malden, Mass.: Wiley-Blackwell. pp. 147–167.

Analytics

Added to PP
2024-10-15

Downloads
1,166 (#43,345)

6 months
340 (#18,581)

Historical graph of downloads
How can I increase my downloads?

Author's Profile

Lucy McDonald
King's College London

References found in this work

Speech Acts: An Essay in the Philosophy of Language.John Rogers Searle - 1969 - Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
Intention and convention in speech acts.Peter F. Strawson - 1964 - Philosophical Review 73 (4):439-460.
Which Concepts Should We Use?: Metalinguistic Negotiations and The Methodology of Philosophy.David Plunkett - 2015 - Inquiry: An Interdisciplinary Journal of Philosophy 58 (7-8):828-874.

View all 26 references / Add more references